Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Turnaround time prediction for clinical chemistry samples using machine learning.
Tsai, Eline R; Demirtas, Derya; Hoogendijk, Nick; Tintu, Andrei N; Boucherie, Richard J.
Afiliación
  • Tsai ER; Center for Healthcare Operations Improvement and Research (CHOIR), University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • Demirtas D; Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Hoogendijk N; Center for Healthcare Operations Improvement and Research (CHOIR), University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • Tintu AN; Center for Healthcare Operations Improvement and Research (CHOIR), University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • Boucherie RJ; Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 60(12): 1902-1910, 2022 11 25.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36219883
OBJECTIVES: Turnaround time (TAT) is an essential performance indicator of a medical diagnostic laboratory. Accurate TAT prediction is crucial for taking timely action in case of prolonged TAT and is important for efficient organization of healthcare. The objective was to develop a model to accurately predict TAT, focusing on the automated pre-analytical and analytical phase. METHODS: A total of 90,543 clinical chemistry samples from Erasmus MC were included and 39 features were analyzed, including priority level and workload in the different stages upon sample arrival. PyCaret was used to evaluate and compare multiple regression models, including the Extra Trees (ET) Regressor, Ridge Regression and K Neighbors Regressor, to determine the best model for TAT prediction. The relative residual and SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values were plotted for model evaluation. RESULTS: The regression-tree-based method ET Regressor performed best with an R2 of 0.63, a mean absolute error of 2.42 min and a mean absolute percentage error of 7.35%, where the average TAT was 30.09 min. Of the test set samples, 77% had a relative residual error of at most 10%. SHAP value analysis indicated that TAT was mainly influenced by the workload in pre-analysis upon sample arrival and the number of modules visited. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate TAT predictions were attained with the ET Regressor and features with the biggest impact on TAT were identified, enabling the laboratory to take timely action in case of prolonged TAT and helping healthcare providers to improve planning of scarce resources to increase healthcare efficiency.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Química Clínica / Aprendizaje Automático Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Chem Lab Med Asunto de la revista: QUIMICA CLINICA / TECNICAS E PROCEDIMENTOS DE LABORATORIO Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos Pais de publicación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Química Clínica / Aprendizaje Automático Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Chem Lab Med Asunto de la revista: QUIMICA CLINICA / TECNICAS E PROCEDIMENTOS DE LABORATORIO Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos Pais de publicación: Alemania