Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The optimal first-line treatment for patients with left-sided RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: Double-drug regimen or triple-drug regimen therapy.
Cai, Changjing; Luo, Qingqing; Liu, Yihan; Peng, Yinghui; Zhang, Xiangyang; Jiang, Zhaohui; Feng, Ziyang; Qi, Yaru; Gao, Yan; Liu, Yongting; Liu, Ping; Chen, Yihong; Guo, Cao; Shen, Hong; Zeng, Shan; Han, Ying.
Afiliación
  • Cai C; Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Luo Q; National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Liu Y; Department of Oncology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
  • Peng Y; Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Zhang X; National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Jiang Z; Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Feng Z; National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Qi Y; Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Gao Y; National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Liu Y; Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Liu P; National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Chen Y; Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Guo C; National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Shen H; Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Zeng S; National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Han Y; Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Front Pharmacol ; 13: 1015510, 2022.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36249804
There are many treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Among them, uncertainty remains especially concerning the clinical benefit of different regimens for left-sided RAS wild-type (WT) mCRC in the triple-drug therapy era. No studies have been conducted to answer this critical clinical issue. We performed a comprehensive analysis of published data and real-world data. First, we conducted analyses of the published trials to show the landscape of efficacy and safety in the treatments of left-sided RAS WT mCRC. Then, we initiated a multicenter real-world study as the validation dataset. This study included six published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a total of 1925 patients. The double-drug regimen plus cetuximab/panitumumab (D + C/P) achieved the longest overall survival (OS) in patients with left-sided mCRC (HR = 0.74, 95%CI: 0.57-0.98), while triple-drug regimen with bevacizumab (T + B, HR = 1.1, 95%CI: 0.63-2.0), compared with double-drug with bevacizumab (D + B). The D + C/P had the highest overall response rate (ORR) in patients with left-sided mCRC (OR = 1.8, 95%CI: 0.89-3.8), while T + B (OR = 1.8, 95%CI: 0.70-4.8), compared with D + B. The multicenter real-world cohort showed the double-drug regimen plus cetuximab had longer progression-free survival (PFS) in left-sided mCRC patients than the triple-drug regimen with bevacizumab. The safety analysis showed the incidence of the adverse events (grade≥3) in the triple-drug therapy plus bevacizumab was higher than that in the double-drug therapy plus cetuximab/panitumumab. This work demonstrates the ranking of three regimens for therapeutic efficacy and safety in patients with left-sided RAS WT mCRC. The double-drug regimen plus cetuximab/panitumumab appears more effective and safer than double-drug and triple-drug based regimens with bevacizumab. Further trials and cohort analyses on this topic would increase confidence in these results.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Pharmacol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Pharmacol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Suiza