Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of Treatment Response after Pressurized Intra-Peritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) for Appendiceal Peritoneal Metastases.
Somashekhar, S P; Abba, Julio; Sgarbura, Olivia; Alyami, Mohammad; Teixeira Farinha, Hugo; Rao, Ramya G; Willaert, Wouter; Hübner, Martin.
Afiliación
  • Somashekhar SP; Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Manipal Hospital, HAL Old Airport Rd, Kodihalli, Bengaluru 560017, India.
  • Abba J; Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, CEDEX 09, F-38043 Grenoble, France.
  • Sgarbura O; Surgical Oncology Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University of Montpellier, F-34298 Montpellier, France.
  • Alyami M; Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, F-34298 Montpellier, France.
  • Teixeira Farinha H; Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, King Khalid Hospital, Najran 66262, Saudi Arabia.
  • Rao RG; Department of Visceral Surgery, Faculty of Biology and Medicine UNIL, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Willaert W; Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Manipal Hospital, HAL Old Airport Rd, Kodihalli, Bengaluru 560017, India.
  • Hübner M; Department of GI Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(20)2022 Oct 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36291781
Background The aim of this study was to analyse survival and surrogates for oncological response after PIPAC for appendiceal tumours. Methods This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with appendiceal peritoneal metastases (PM) treated in experienced PIPAC centers. Primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS) from the date of diagnosis of PM and from the start of PIPAC. Predefined secondary outcome included radiological response (RECIST criteria), repeat laparoscopy and peritoneal cancer index (PCI), histological response assessed by the Peritoneal regression grading system (PRGS) and clinical response. Results Final analysis included 77 consecutive patients (208 PIPAC procedures) from 15 centres. Median OS was 30 months (23.00-46.00) from time of diagnosis and 19 months (13.00-28.00) from start of PIPAC. 35/77 patients (45%) had ≥3 procedures (pp: per protocol). Objective response at PIPAC3 was as follows: RECIST: complete response 4 (11.4%), 11 (31.4%) partial/stable; mean PRGS at PIPAC3: 1.8 ± 0.9. Median PCI: 21 (IQR 18-27) vs. 22 (IQR 17-28) at baseline (p = 0.59); 21 (60%) and 18 (51%) patients were symptomatic at baseline and PIPAC3, respectively (p = 0.873). Median OS in the pp cohort was 22.00 months (19.00-NA) from 1st PIPAC. Conclusion Patients with PM of appendiceal origin had objective treatment response after PIPAC and encouraging survival curves call for further prospective evaluation.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India Pais de publicación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India Pais de publicación: Suiza