Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Postoperative analysis of osseous midface reconstructions: The value of imaging and a novel scoring system for complexity and operative success.
Swendseid, Brian; Philips, Ramez H W; Carey, Ryan M; Cannady, Steven B; Sweeny, Larissa; Wax, Mark K; Luginbuhl, Adam J; Curry, Joseph M.
Afiliación
  • Swendseid B; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Philips RHW; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Cooper University Health, Camden, New Jersey, USA.
  • Carey RM; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Cannady SB; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Sweeny L; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Wax MK; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
  • Luginbuhl AJ; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Curry JM; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Head Neck ; 45(1): 237-242, 2023 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36300998
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Few standardized methods exist for evaluating the postoperative outcomes of osteocutaneous free flaps. We propose an anatomic-based scoring system for midface free flap reconstruction.

METHODS:

One hundred and twelve patients across four institutions underwent osteocutaneous reconstruction of the midface. Postoperative scans were scored based on the number of independent osseous subunits reconstructed (Subunit Score), the number of different bony appositions with bony contact (Contact Score), and the number of osseous segments in anatomic position (Position Score). These were added together to create a Total Score.

RESULTS:

Osteocutaneous radial forearm flaps had the lowest Subunit Score (p = 0.001). Fibula flaps had the highest Contact Score (p = 0.0008) and Position Score (p = 0.001). Virtual surgical planning was associated with an increased Subunit Score (p = 0.02) and Total Score (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS:

We propose a novel scoring system for osseous midface reconstruction based on postoperative imaging scans. This can help guide management decisions and create a common language to compare outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica / Colgajos Tisulares Libres Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Head Neck Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica / Colgajos Tisulares Libres Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Head Neck Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos