Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Regulation of cerebrovascular compliance compared with forearm vascular compliance in humans: a pharmacological study.
Moir, M Erin; Klassen, Stephen A; Zamir, Mair; Hamner, J W; Tan, Can Ozan; Shoemaker, J Kevin.
Afiliación
  • Moir ME; School of Kinesiology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
  • Klassen SA; Department of Kinesiology, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.
  • Zamir M; Department of Mathematics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
  • Hamner JW; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
  • Tan CO; Cerebrovascular Research Laboratory, Spaulding Hospital Cambridge, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  • Shoemaker JK; RAM, Electrical Engineering, Mathematics, and Computer Science, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol ; 324(1): H100-H108, 2023 01 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36459447
ABSTRACT
Increasing evidence indicates that cerebrovascular compliance contributes to the dynamic regulation of cerebral blood flow but the mechanisms regulating cerebrovascular compliance in humans are unknown. This retrospective study investigated the impact of neural, endothelial, and myogenic mechanisms on the regulation of vascular compliance in the cerebral vascular bed compared with the forearm vascular bed. An index of vascular compliance (Ci) was assessed using a Windkessel model applied to blood pressure waveforms (finger photoplethysmography) and corresponding middle cerebral artery blood velocity or brachial artery blood velocity waveforms (Doppler ultrasound). Data were analyzed during a 5-min baseline period (10 waveforms) under control conditions and during distinct sympathetic blockade (experiment 1, phentolamine; 10 adults), cholinergic blockade (experiment 2, glycopyrrolate; 9 adults), and myogenic blockade (experiment 3, nicardipine; 14 adults). In experiment 1, phentolamine increased Ci similarly in the cerebral vascular bed (131 ± 135%) and forearm vascular bed (93 ± 75%; P = 0.45). In experiment 2, glycopyrrolate increased cerebrovascular Ci (72 ± 61%) and forearm vascular Ci (74 ± 64%) to a similar extent (P = 0.88). In experiment 3, nicardipine increased Ci but to a greater extent in the cerebral vascular bed (88 ± 88%) than forearm vascular bed (20 ± 45%; P = 0.01). Therefore, adrenergic, cholinergic, and myogenic mechanisms contribute to the regulation of cerebrovascular and forearm vascular compliance. However, myogenic mechanisms appear to exert more specific control over vascular compliance in the brain relative to the forearm.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Vascular compliance represents an important determinant in the dynamics and regulation of blood flow through a vascular bed. However, the mechanisms that regulate vascular compliance remain poorly understood. This study examined the impact of neural, endothelial, and myogenic mechanisms on cerebrovascular compliance compared with forearm vascular compliance. Distinct pharmacological blockade of α-adrenergic, endothelial muscarinic, and myogenic inputs altered cerebrovascular and forearm vascular compliance. These results further our understanding of vascular control and blood flow regulation in the brain.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Nicardipino / Antebrazo Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Asunto de la revista: CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Nicardipino / Antebrazo Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Asunto de la revista: CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá