Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient-provider communication while using a clinical decision support tool: explaining satisfaction with shared decision making for mammography screening.
Liu, Yan; Kornfield, Rachel; Yang, Ellie Fan; Burnside, Elizabeth; Keevil, Jon; Shah, Dhavan V.
Afiliación
  • Liu Y; School of Journalism and Communication, Shanghai University, 149 Yanchang Drive, 1006 Xingjian Building, Shanghai, 200072, China. yliu680@shu.edu.cn.
  • Kornfield R; Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
  • Yang EF; School of Communication and Mass Media, Northwest Missouri State University, Maryville, MO, 64468, USA.
  • Burnside E; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
  • Keevil J; EBSCO Industries, Madison, WI, 53726, USA.
  • Shah DV; School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ; 22(1): 323, 2022 12 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36476612
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Clinical decision aids may support shared decision-making for screening mammography. To inform shared decision-making between patients and their providers, this study examines how patterns of using an EHR-integrated decision aid and accompanying verbal patient-provider communication predict decision-making satisfaction.

METHODS:

For 51 patient visits during which a mammography decision aid was used, linguistic characteristics of patient-provider verbal communication were extracted from transcribed audio recordings and system logs automatically captured uses of the decision aid. Surveys assessed patients' post-visit decisional satisfaction and its subcomponents. Linear mixed effects models assessed how patients' satisfaction with decision making was related to patterns of verbal communication and navigation of the decision aid.

RESULTS:

The results indicate that providers' use of quantitative language during the encounter was positively associated with patients' overall satisfaction, feeling informed, and values clarity. Patients' question-asking was negatively associated with overall satisfaction, values clarity, and certainty perception. Where system use data indicated the dyad had cycled through the decision-making process more than once ("looping" back through pages of the decision aid), patients reported improved satisfaction with shared decision making and all subcomponents. Overall satisfaction, perceived support, certainty, and perceived effectiveness of decision-making were lowest when a high number of navigating clicks occurred absent "looping."

CONCLUSIONS:

Linguistic features of patient-provider communication and system use data of a decision aid predict patients' satisfaction with shared decision making. Our findings have implications for the design of decision aid tools and clinician training to support more effective shared decision-making for screening mammography.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Asunto de la revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Asunto de la revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China