Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of glenoid baseplate initial micromotion and fixation strength in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty designs using a direct shear force methodology.
Parr, Therese E; Anderson, Jennifer K; Marionneaux, Alan M; Tokish, John M; Tolan, Stefan J; Hawkins, Richard J; Kissenberth, Michael J; DesJardins, John D.
Afiliación
  • Parr TE; Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
  • Anderson JK; Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
  • Marionneaux AM; Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
  • Tokish JM; Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Prisma Health, Greenville, SC, USA.
  • Tolan SJ; Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Prisma Health, Greenville, SC, USA.
  • Hawkins RJ; Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Prisma Health, Greenville, SC, USA.
  • Kissenberth MJ; Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Prisma Health, Greenville, SC, USA.
  • DesJardins JD; Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Shoulder Elbow ; 14(6): 606-614, 2022 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36479005
ABSTRACT

Background:

In a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, the altered glenohumeral joint center of rotation subjects the glenoid baseplate to increased shear forces and potential loosening.

Methods:

This study examined glenoid baseplate micromotion and initial fixation strength with the application of direct shear force in a Sawbone model. The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty systems examined were the DJO Reverse® Shoulder Prosthesis, the Exactech Equinoxe® Reverse System, and the Tornier AequalisTM Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis. Specimens were cyclically tested with increasing shear loads until 150 µm of displacement between the implant and glenoid was achieved, and subsequently until failure, classified as either 1 cm of implant/glenoid displacement or fracture.

Results:

The average load withstood for the 150 µm threshold for DJO, Tornier, and Exactech was 460 ± 88 N, 525 ± 100 N, and 585 ± 160 N, respectively. The average total load at device failure for DJO, Tornier, and Exactech was 980 ± 260 N, 1260 ± 120 N, and 1350 ± 230 N, respectively.

Discussion:

The Exactech implant design trended toward requiring more load to induce micromotion at each threshold and to induce device failure, most commonly seen as inferior screw pull out. This study proposes design features that may enhance fixation and suggests little risk of initial micromotion or failure during initial post-operative recovery.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Shoulder Elbow Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Shoulder Elbow Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos