Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Young drivers and smartphone use: The impact of legal and non-legal deterrents.
Ogden, Joannah; Brown, Patricia M; George, Amanda M.
Afiliación
  • Ogden J; Discipline of Psychology, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, 11 Kirinari Street, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia. Electronic address: u3160569@uni.canberra.edu.au.
  • Brown PM; Discipline of Psychology, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, 11 Kirinari Street, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia. Electronic address: tricia.brown@canberra.edu.au.
  • George AM; Discipline of Psychology, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, 11 Kirinari Street, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia. Electronic address: amanda.george@canberra.edu.au.
J Safety Res ; 83: 329-338, 2022 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36481024
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Young drivers continue to be overrepresented in road crash statistics and smartphone use has been identified as a dangerous form of driver distraction. Previous research has identified factors encouraging drivers to use their mobile phone, with few examining what deters drivers. This study examines the influence of legal and non-legal deterrents on smartphone use while driving (SWD) in a young adult sample.

METHOD:

An online survey was administered to a sample of 524 Australian drivers aged 17-25 years. Measures included demographic variables, legal deterrents (certainty, severity, and swiftness), and non-legal deterrents social loss (peers and parents), internal loss (anticipated regret) and physical loss (injury to self/others). Self-reported SWD was the outcome variable, measured separately for initiating SWD and responding SWD behaviors.

RESULTS:

Responding behaviors were reported more frequently than initiating, and social, internal, and physical loss were perceived as higher for initiating versus responding behaviors. Anticipated action regret and physical loss were significant negative predictors of SWD across both modalities of communication. Anticipated inaction regret was also a significant positive predictor of initiating behaviors. Both legal deterrents and social loss were non-significant predictors for both modalities of SWD.

CONCLUSIONS:

The results reinforce previous evidence showing that legal deterrence variables are not consistently effective at reducing offending behaviors. Future research should continue to explore the effect of non-legal deterrents across different modalities of SWD. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS Road safety interventions aimed at young drivers should evaluate the impact of highlighting anticipated regret and potential injury to self and others associated with risky driving behaviors, such as SWD.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conducción de Automóvil / Conducción Distraída Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: J Safety Res Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conducción de Automóvil / Conducción Distraída Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: J Safety Res Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article