Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative efficacy, cognitive effects and acceptability of electroconvulsive therapies for the treatment of depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Nikolin, Stevan; Owens, Kieran; Francis-Taylor, Rohan; Chaimani, Anna; Martin, Donel M; Bull, Michael; Sackeim, Harold A; McLoughlin, Declan M; Sienaert, Pascal; Kellner, Charles H; Loo, Colleen.
Afiliación
  • Nikolin S; Department of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia stevan.nikolin@unsw.edu.au.
  • Owens K; Black Dog Institute, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Francis-Taylor R; Department of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Chaimani A; Department of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Martin DM; Black Dog Institute, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Bull M; Research Center of Epidemiology (CRESS-UMR1153), INSERM, INRA, Universite de Paris, Paris, France.
  • Sackeim HA; Department of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • McLoughlin DM; Black Dog Institute, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Sienaert P; Department of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Kellner CH; Black Dog Institute, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Loo C; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
BMJ Open ; 12(12): e068313, 2022 12 22.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36549738
INTRODUCTION: There have been important advances in the use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) to treat major depressive episodes. These include variations to the type of stimulus the brain regions stimulated, and the stimulus parameters (eg, stimulus duration/pulse width). Our aim is to investigate ECT types using a network meta-analysis (NMA) approach and report on comparative treatment efficacy, cognitive side effects and acceptability. METHOD: We will conduct a systematic review to identify randomised controlled trials that compared two or more ECT protocols to treat depression. This will be done using the following databases: Embase, MEDLINE PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, Cochrane CENTRAL and will be supplemented by personal contacts with researchers in the field. All authors will be contacted to provide missing information. Primary outcomes will be symptom severity on a validated continuous clinician-rated scale of depression, cognitive functioning measured using anterograde verbal recall, and acceptability calculated using all-cause drop-outs. Secondary outcomes will include response and remission rates, autobiographical memory following a course of ECT, and anterograde visuospatial recall.Bayesian random effects hierarchical models will compare ECT types. Additional meta-regressions may be conducted to determine the impact of effect modifiers and patient-specific prognostic factors if sufficient data are available. DISCUSSION: This NMA will facilitate clinician decision making and allow more sophisticated selection of ECT type according to the balance of efficacy, cognitive side effects and acceptability. ETHICS: This systematic review and NMA does not require research ethics approval as it will use published aggregate data and will not collect nor disclose individually identifiable participant data. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022357098.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastorno Depresivo Mayor / Terapia Electroconvulsiva Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Ethics Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastorno Depresivo Mayor / Terapia Electroconvulsiva Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Ethics Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido