Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Investigating Psychological Impact after Receiving Genetic Risk Results-A Survey of Participants in a Population Genomic Screening Program.
McCormick, Cara Zayac; Yu, Kristen Dilzell; Johns, Alicia; Campbell-Salome, Gemme; Hallquist, Miranda L G; Sturm, Amy C; Buchanan, Adam H.
Afiliación
  • McCormick CZ; Department of Genomic Health, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA.
  • Yu KD; Department of Genomic Health, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA.
  • Johns A; Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA.
  • Campbell-Salome G; Department of Genomic Health, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA.
  • Hallquist MLG; Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA.
  • Sturm AC; Department of Genomic Health, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA.
  • Buchanan AH; Department of Genomic Health, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA.
J Pers Med ; 12(12)2022 Nov 22.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36556164
Genomic screening programs have potential to benefit individuals who may not be clinically ascertained, but little is known about the psychological impact of receiving genetic results in this setting. The current study sought to further the understanding of individuals' psychological response to receiving an actionable genetic test result from genomic screening. Telephone surveys were conducted with patient-participants at 6 weeks and 6 months post genetic result disclosure between September 2019 and May 2021 and assessed emotional response to receiving results via the FACToR, PANAS, and decision regret scales. Overall, 354 (29.4%) study participants completed both surveys. Participants reported moderate positive emotions and low levels of negative emotions, uncertainty, privacy concern, and decision regret over time. There were significant decreases in negative emotions (p = 0.0004) and uncertainty (p = 0.0126) between time points on the FACToR scale. "Interested" was the highest scoring discrete emotion (T1 3.6, T2 3.3, scale 0−5) but was significantly lower at 6 months (<0.0001). Coupled with other benefits of genomic screening, these results of modest psychological impact waning over time adds support to clinical utility of population genomic screening programs. However, questions remain regarding how to elicit an emotional response that motivates behavior change without causing psychological harm.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Pers Med Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Pers Med Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Suiza