Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An interpretable model predicts visual outcomes of no light perception eyes after open globe injury.
Meng, Xiangda; Wang, Qihua; Chen, Song; Zhang, Shijie; Yu, Jinguo; Li, Haibo; Chen, Xinkang; Wang, Zhaoyang; Yu, Wenzhen; Zheng, Zhi; Zhou, Heding; Luo, Jing; Wang, Zhiliang; Chen, Haoyu; Wu, Nan; Hu, Dan; Chen, Suihua; Wei, Yong; Cui, Haibin; Song, Huping; Chen, Huijin; Wang, Yun; Zhong, Jie; Chen, Zhen; Zhang, Haokun; Yang, Tiantian; Li, Mengxuan; Liu, Yuanyuan; Dong, Xue; Du, Mei; Wang, Xiaohong; Yao, Xuyang; Lin, Haotian; Li, Mulin Jun; Yan, Hua.
Afiliación
  • Meng X; Department of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  • Wang Q; Department of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  • Chen S; Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
  • Zhang S; Department of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  • Yu J; Department of Pharmacology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Inflammation Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
  • Li H; Department of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  • Chen X; Department of Ocular Trauma, Xiamen University Xiamen Eye Center, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
  • Wang Z; Department of Pharmacology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Inflammation Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
  • Yu W; Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
  • Zheng Z; Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Zhou H; Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
  • Luo J; Department of Ophthalmology, Ningbo Eye Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
  • Wang Z; Department of Ophthalmology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Chen H; Department of Ophthalmology, Fudan University Huashan Hospital, Shanghai, China.
  • Wu N; Department of Ocular Trauma, Joint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
  • Hu D; Department of Ophthalmology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
  • Chen S; Department of Ophthalmology, Eye Institute of Chinese PLA, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
  • Wei Y; Department of Ophthalmology, General Hospital of Eastern Theater Command, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
  • Cui H; National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
  • Song H; Department of Ocular Trauma, Heilongjiang Province Ophthalmology Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
  • Chen H; Department of Ophthalmology, Xi'an People's Hospital (Xi'an No.4 Hospital), Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
  • Wang Y; Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Zhong J; Department of Ophthalmology, Xining First People's Hospital, Xining, Qinghai, China.
  • Chen Z; Department of Ophthalmology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
  • Zhang H; Eye Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
  • Yang T; Department of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  • Li M; Department of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  • Liu Y; Department of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  • Dong X; Department of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  • Du M; Department of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  • Wang X; Laboratory of Molecular Ophthalmology and Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ocular Trauma, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
  • Yao X; Department of Pharmacology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Inflammation Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
  • Lin H; Laboratory of Molecular Ophthalmology and Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ocular Trauma, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
  • Li MJ; Department of Pharmacology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Inflammation Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
  • Yan H; Laboratory of Molecular Ophthalmology and Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ocular Trauma, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 108(2): 285-293, 2024 01 29.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36596662
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The visual outcome of open globe injury (OGI)-no light perception (NLP) eyes is unpredictable traditionally. This study aimed to develop a model to predict the visual outcomes of vitrectomy surgery in OGI-NLP eyes using a machine learning algorithm and to provide an interpretable system for the prediction results.

METHODS:

Clinical data of 459 OGI-NLP eyes were retrospectively collected from 19 medical centres across China to establish a training data set for developing a model, called 'VisionGo', which can predict the visual outcome of the patients involved and compare with the Ocular Trauma Score (OTS). Another 72 cases were retrospectively collected and used for human-machine comparison, and an additional 27 cases were prospectively collected for real-world validation of the model. The SHapley Additive exPlanations method was applied to analyse feature contribution to the model. An online platform was built for real-world application.

RESULTS:

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of VisionGo was 0.75 and 0.90 in previtrectomy and intravitrectomy application scenarios, which was much higher than the OTS (AUC=0.49). VisionGo showed better performance than ophthalmologists in both previtrectomy and intravitrectomy application scenarios (AUC=0.73 vs 0.57 and 0.87 vs 0.64). In real-world validation, VisionGo achieved an AUC of 0.60 and 0.91 in previtrectomy and intravitrectomy application scenarios. Feature contribution analysis indicated that wound length-related indicators, vitreous status and retina-related indicators contributed highly to visual outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS:

VisionGo has achieved an accurate and reliable prediction in visual outcome after vitrectomy for OGI-NLP eyes.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Lesiones Oculares Penetrantes / Lesiones Oculares Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Ophthalmol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Lesiones Oculares Penetrantes / Lesiones Oculares Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Ophthalmol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China