Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on the management of acute peptic ulcer perforation: to be reconsidered(?).
Tulinský, Lubomír; Sengul, Ilker; Ihnát, Peter; Mitták, Marcel; Toman, Daniel; Pelikán, Anton; Martínek, Lubomír; Sengul, Demet.
Afiliación
  • Tulinský L; Ostravská Univerzita, Department of General Surgery - Ostrava, Czech Republic.
  • Sengul I; Ostravská Univerzita, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Studies - Ostrava, Czech Republic.
  • Ihnát P; Giresun University, Faculty of Medicine, Division of Endocrine Surgery - Giresun, Turkey.
  • Mitták M; Giresun University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery - Giresun, Turkey.
  • Toman D; Ostravská Univerzita, Department of General Surgery - Ostrava, Czech Republic.
  • Pelikán A; Ostravská Univerzita, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Studies - Ostrava, Czech Republic.
  • Martínek L; Ostravská Univerzita, Department of General Surgery - Ostrava, Czech Republic.
  • Sengul D; Ostravská Univerzita, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Studies - Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 69(1): 175-180, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36629661
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Peptic ulcer perforation presents the most serious complication of ulcer disease with mortality that varies significantly depending on the age and conditions. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was effective worldwide in 2020 and continues to date. The aim of this study was to investigate the initial clinical parameters and short-term outcomes of patients with acute peptic ulcer perforation before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

METHODS:

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic. The patients undergoing surgical modality of a simple suture of peptic ulcer perforation with/without omentoplasty in the post-coronavirus disease 2019 (January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021) and the pre-coronavirus disease 2019 (January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019) had been incorporated in this study.

RESULTS:

This study included a total of 46 cases (26 in the pre-coronavirus disease 2019, 20 in the post-coronavirus disease 2019). The age, body mass index, Boey score, duration of symptoms, surgery time, and length of hospital stay were comparable in both study subgroups. During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, patients were admitted with a statistically significantly lower degree of perioperative risk according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (p=0.013). Notably, 30-day postoperative morbidity was significantly higher in pre-coronavirus disease 2019 (73.1 vs. 55.0%, p=0.038). The mortality rate in the laparoscopic group was 13.6%, in the laparotomy group 41.4%, and the mortality rate was higher in pre-coronavirus disease 2019 than in post-coronavirus disease 2019 (34.6 vs. 20.0%, p=0.166).

CONCLUSION:

In fact, the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic had not significantly influenced therapeutic management and short-term outcomes of patients undergoing acute surgical repair of peptic ulcer perforation.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Úlcera Péptica Perforada / Laparoscopía / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: República Checa

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Úlcera Péptica Perforada / Laparoscopía / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: República Checa