Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Carbon uptake in Eurasian boreal forests dominates the high-latitude net ecosystem carbon budget.
Watts, Jennifer D; Farina, Mary; Kimball, John S; Schiferl, Luke D; Liu, Zhihua; Arndt, Kyle A; Zona, Donatella; Ballantyne, Ashley; Euskirchen, Eugénie S; Parmentier, Frans-Jan W; Helbig, Manuel; Sonnentag, Oliver; Tagesson, Torbern; Rinne, Janne; Ikawa, Hiroki; Ueyama, Masahito; Kobayashi, Hideki; Sachs, Torsten; Nadeau, Daniel F; Kochendorfer, John; Jackowicz-Korczynski, Marcin; Virkkala, Anna; Aurela, Mika; Commane, Roisin; Byrne, Brendan; Birch, Leah; Johnson, Matthew S; Madani, Nima; Rogers, Brendan; Du, Jinyang; Endsley, Arthur; Savage, Kathleen; Poulter, Ben; Zhang, Zhen; Bruhwiler, Lori M; Miller, Charles E; Goetz, Scott; Oechel, Walter C.
Afiliación
  • Watts JD; Woodwell Climate Research Center, Falmouth, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Farina M; Woodwell Climate Research Center, Falmouth, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Kimball JS; Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA.
  • Schiferl LD; Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group (NTSG), ISB 415, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA.
  • Liu Z; Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York, USA.
  • Arndt KA; John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Zona D; Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group (NTSG), ISB 415, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA.
  • Ballantyne A; Woodwell Climate Research Center, Falmouth, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Euskirchen ES; Earth Systems Research Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, USA.
  • Parmentier FW; Global Change Research Group, Department of Biology, Physical Sciences 240, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Helbig M; Global Climate and Ecology Laboratory, W.A. Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA.
  • Sonnentag O; Institute of Arctic Biology, Fairbanks, Alaska, USA.
  • Tagesson T; Department of Geosciences, Center for Biogeochemistry in the Anthropocene, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Rinne J; Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
  • Ikawa H; Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
  • Ueyama M; University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Kobayashi H; Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
  • Sachs T; Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
  • Nadeau DF; Natural Resources Institute Finland, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Kochendorfer J; Hokkaido Agricultural Research Center, NARO, Sapporo, Japan.
  • Jackowicz-Korczynski M; Osaka Metropolitan University, Sakai, Japan.
  • Virkkala A; JAMSTEC-Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama, Japan.
  • Aurela M; GFZ German Research Centre for Geoscience, Potsdam, Germany.
  • Commane R; Department of Civil and Water Engineering, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
  • Byrne B; NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Atmospheric and Turbulent Diffusion Division, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
  • Birch L; Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
  • Johnson MS; Department of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark.
  • Madani N; Woodwell Climate Research Center, Falmouth, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Rogers B; Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Du J; Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York, USA.
  • Endsley A; Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
  • Savage K; Woodwell Climate Research Center, Falmouth, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Poulter B; Biospheric Science Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA.
  • Zhang Z; Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
  • Bruhwiler LM; Woodwell Climate Research Center, Falmouth, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Miller CE; Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group (NTSG), ISB 415, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA.
  • Goetz S; Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group (NTSG), ISB 415, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA.
  • Oechel WC; Woodwell Climate Research Center, Falmouth, Massachusetts, USA.
Glob Chang Biol ; 29(7): 1870-1889, 2023 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36647630
ABSTRACT
Arctic-boreal landscapes are experiencing profound warming, along with changes in ecosystem moisture status and disturbance from fire. This region is of global importance in terms of carbon feedbacks to climate, yet the sign (sink or source) and magnitude of the Arctic-boreal carbon budget within recent years remains highly uncertain. Here, we provide new estimates of recent (2003-2015) vegetation gross primary productivity (GPP), ecosystem respiration (Reco ), net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE; Reco - GPP), and terrestrial methane (CH4 ) emissions for the Arctic-boreal zone using a satellite data-driven process-model for northern ecosystems (TCFM-Arctic), calibrated and evaluated using measurements from >60 tower eddy covariance (EC) sites. We used TCFM-Arctic to obtain daily 1-km2 flux estimates and annual carbon budgets for the pan-Arctic-boreal region. Across the domain, the model indicated an overall average NEE sink of -850 Tg CO2 -C year-1 . Eurasian boreal zones, especially those in Siberia, contributed to a majority of the net sink. In contrast, the tundra biome was relatively carbon neutral (ranging from small sink to source). Regional CH4 emissions from tundra and boreal wetlands (not accounting for aquatic CH4 ) were estimated at 35 Tg CH4 -C year-1 . Accounting for additional emissions from open water aquatic bodies and from fire, using available estimates from the literature, reduced the total regional NEE sink by 21% and shifted many far northern tundra landscapes, and some boreal forests, to a net carbon source. This assessment, based on in situ observations and models, improves our understanding of the high-latitude carbon status and also indicates a continued need for integrated site-to-regional assessments to monitor the vulnerability of these ecosystems to climate change.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ecosistema / Taiga Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation Idioma: En Revista: Glob Chang Biol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ecosistema / Taiga Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation Idioma: En Revista: Glob Chang Biol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...