Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How do we best engage young people in decision-making about their health? A scoping review of deliberative priority setting methods.
Watson, Daniella; Mhlaba, Mimi; Molelekeng, Gontse; Chauke, Thulani Andrew; Simao, Sara Correia; Jenner, Sarah; Ware, Lisa J; Barker, Mary.
Afiliación
  • Watson D; Global Health Research Institute, Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. daniella.watson@kcl.ac.uk.
  • Mhlaba M; SAMRC Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. daniella.watson@kcl.ac.uk.
  • Molelekeng G; Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London, UK. daniella.watson@kcl.ac.uk.
  • Chauke TA; SAMRC Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
  • Simao SC; SAMRC Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
  • Jenner S; Department of Adult, College of Education, Community and Continuing Education, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
  • Ware LJ; Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Barker M; Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Int J Equity Health ; 22(1): 17, 2023 01 25.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36698119
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

International organisations have called to increase young people's involvement in healthcare and health policy development. We currently lack effective methods for facilitating meaningful engagement by young people in health-related decision-making. The purpose of this scoping review is to identify deliberative priority setting methods and explore the effectiveness of these in engaging young people in healthcare and health policy decision-making.

METHODS:

Seven databases were searched systematically, using MeSH and free text terms, for articles published in English before July 2021 that described the use of deliberative priority setting methods for health decision-making with young people. All titles, abstracts and full-text papers were screened by a team of six independent reviewers between them. Data extraction followed the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination guidelines. The results are presented as a narrative synthesis, structured around four components for evaluating deliberative processes 1) representation and inclusion of diverse participants, 2) the way the process is run including levels and timing of participant engagement, 3) the quality of the information provided to participants and 4) resulting outcomes and decisions.

FINDINGS:

The search yielded 9 reviews and 21 studies. The more engaging deliberative priority setting tools involved young people-led committees, mixed methods for identifying and prioritising issues and digital data collection and communication tools. Long-term and frequent contact with young people to build trust underpinned the success of some of the tools, as did offering incentives for taking part and skills development using creative methods. The review also suggests that successful priority setting processes with young people involve consideration of power dynamics, since young people's decisions are likely to be made together with family members, health professionals and academics.

DISCUSSION:

Young people's engagement in decision-making about their health is best achieved through investing time in building strong relationships and ensuring young people are appropriately rewarded for their time and contribution. If young people are to be instrumental in improving their health and architects of their own futures, decision-making processes need to respect young people's autonomy and agency. Our review suggests that methods of power-sharing with young people do exist but that they have yet to be adopted by organisations and global institutions setting global health policy.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Personal de Salud / Narración Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adolescent / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Equity Health Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Personal de Salud / Narración Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adolescent / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Equity Health Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido