Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Anesthetic Considerations for Second-Trimester Surgical Abortions.
Ozery, Elizabeth; Ansari, Jessica; Kaur, Simranvir; Shaw, Kate A; Henkel, Andrea.
Afiliación
  • Ozery E; From the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
  • Ansari J; From the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
  • Kaur S; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Family Planning Services & Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
  • Shaw KA; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Family Planning Services & Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
  • Henkel A; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Family Planning Services & Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Anesth Analg ; 137(2): 345-353, 2023 08 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36729414
Although most abortion care takes place in the office setting, anesthesiologists are often asked to provide anesthesia for the 1% of abortions that take place later, in the second trimester. Changes in federal and state regulations surrounding abortion services may result in an increase in second-trimester abortions due to barriers to accessing care. The need for interstate travel will reduce access and delay care for everyone, given limited appointment capacity in states that continue to support bodily autonomy. Therefore, anesthesiologists may be increasingly involved in care for these patients. There are multiple, unique anesthetic considerations to provide safe and compassionate care to patients undergoing second-trimester abortion. First, a multiday cervical preparation involving cervical osmotic dilators and pharmacologic agents results in a time-sensitive, nonelective procedure, which should not be delayed or canceled due to risk of fetal expulsion in the preoperative area. In addition, a growing body of literature suggests that the older anesthesia dogma that all pregnant patients require rapid-sequence induction and an endotracheal tube can be abandoned, and that deep sedation without intubation is safe and often preferable for this patient population through 24 weeks of gestation. Finally, concomitant substance use disorders, preoperative pain from cervical preparation, and intraoperative management of uterine atony in a uterus that does not yet have mature oxytocin receptors require additional consideration.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aborto Inducido / Anestésicos Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Anesth Analg Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aborto Inducido / Anestésicos Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Anesth Analg Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos