Why the Ockenden report didn't get it wrong: A review of the evidence.

Cauldwell, Matthew; Banjeree, Anita; Howard, Richard; Jones, Julie; Mial, Lawrence; Magro, Michael; Middleton, Browyn; Nash, Kate; Taylor, Alex; Ockenden, Donna

Cauldwell, Matthew; Banjeree, Anita; Howard, Richard; Jones, Julie; Mial, Lawrence; Magro, Michael; Middleton, Browyn; Nash, Kate; Taylor, Alex; Ockenden, Donna.

Afiliación

Cauldwell M; The Independent Maternity Review, Chichester, UK.
Banjeree A; The Independent Maternity Review, Chichester, UK.
Howard R; The Independent Maternity Review, Chichester, UK.
Jones J; The Independent Maternity Review, Chichester, UK.
Mial L; The Independent Maternity Review, Chichester, UK.
Magro M; The Independent Maternity Review, Chichester, UK.
Middleton B; The Independent Maternity Review, Chichester, UK.
Nash K; The Independent Maternity Review, Chichester, UK.
Taylor A; The Independent Maternity Review, Chichester, UK.
Ockenden D; The Independent Maternity Review, Chichester, UK.

BJOG ; 130(9): 1145-1146, 2023 08.

Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36751019

Texto completo

Añadir a Mi BVS

Imprimir

XML

PubMed Links

Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: BJOG Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo

Añadir a Mi BVS

Imprimir

XML

PubMed Links

Buscar en Google