Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prenatal diagnosis of ultrasound soft markers in a single medical center of mainland China.
Zhou, Yanhong; Wu, Siqi; Han, Jin; Zhen, Li; Yang, Xin; Li, Ru; Zhang, Yongling; Jing, Xiangyi; Li, Fucheng; Liu, Huishu.
Afiliación
  • Zhou Y; Department of Obstetrics, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Wu S; Department of Obstetrics, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Han J; Department of Medical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis, Longgang District Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.
  • Zhen L; Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China. hanjin1123@163.com.
  • Yang X; Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Li R; Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Zhang Y; Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Jing X; Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Li F; Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Liu H; Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Mol Cytogenet ; 16(1): 3, 2023 Feb 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36765363
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There are a few studies on the chromosomal aberration of Ultrasound soft markers (USMs). The aim of this study was to determine the detection rate of clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities (CSCA) in fetuses with different USMs.

METHODS:

This study included fetuses with USMs who underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis for karyotype and/or chromosomal microarray (CMA) by categorizing into two groups a single USM (SUSM) and multiple USMs (MUSMs).

RESULTS:

Of the 358 cases with USMs, CSCA occurred in 3.09% (8/259) and 8.08% (8/99) of the SUSM and MUSM groups, respectively (P < 0.05). Of 16 cases identified with CSCA, theoretically 68.75% (11/16) could be detected by karyotype, while 31.25% (5/16) could be recognized only by CMA. Among CSCA cases, the most frequent USM was an absent or hypoplastic nasal bone (62.5%, 10/16). In cases with negative karyotypes and/or CMA, follow-up results were available in 307 cases, including 292 term deliveries, 6 preterm deliveries, 8 terminations of pregnancy due to USMs, and 1 still birth.

CONCLUSION:

MUSMs increased the risk of chromosomal abnormalities. An absent or hypoplastic nasal bone was the most clinically significant marker either alone or in combination with other USMs. Most of SUSM had a good prognosis.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Mol Cytogenet Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Mol Cytogenet Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China