Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of single-pore non-liposuction near-infrared laparoscopy with conventional open surgery for axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with early breast cancer: a single-center, small-sample retrospective study.
Yao, Cheng-Cai; Liu, Changchun; Xian, Jiayi.
Afiliación
  • Yao CC; Sixth Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology, and Sixth Clinical College of South China University of Technology, Foshan, 528225, People's Republic of China. 744875674@qq.com.
  • Liu C; Department of Breast Surgery, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology, and Sixth Clinical College of South China University of Technology, Foshan, 528225, People's Republic of China.
  • Xian J; Department of Breast Surgery, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology, and Sixth Clinical College of South China University of Technology, Foshan, 528225, People's Republic of China.
World J Surg Oncol ; 21(1): 66, 2023 Feb 28.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36849976
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study aimed to compare the effects of single-pore non-liposuction near-infrared (NIR) endoscopic surgery and traditional open surgery for axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with early breast cancer (EBC).

METHODS:

The clinical pathological data of 61 patients with EBC who underwent axillary SLNB using indocyanine green (ICG) combined with carbon nanoparticle suspension (CNS) were retrospectively collected. Thirty patients received SLNB through single-pore non-liposuction NIR endoscopic surgery (endoscopic group), and the remaining 31 received SLNB through open-incision surgery (open group). The success rate, operation time, volume of intraoperative bleeding, postoperative axillary drainage, axillary extubation time, and the occurrence of postoperative complications were compared between the groups along with the total number of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), luminous SLNs, stained SLNs, and the pathological positivity rate of the SLNs.

RESULTS:

All patients underwent SLNB with a 100% success rate. SLNB operation times of the endoscopic group were longer than those of the open group (t = 3.963, P = 0.000), and the volume of axillary drainage was inferior (t = 3.035, P = 0.004). However, there were no differences in the intraoperative bleeding volumes, axillary extubation times, and postoperative complications (P > 0.05). In the Open group, the mean number of SLNs was 5.12 ± 2.16, and the pathological positivity rate was 13.53%; in the Endoscopic group, these numbers were 4.89 ± 1.73 and 12.39%. The mean number of SLNs detected (t = 0.458, P = 0.649) and the pathological positivity rates (χ2 = 0.058, P = 0.810) did not differ between the two groups. All 61 patients were followed for a median of 14.6 months. There were no local recurrences or distant metastases.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our single-center results reveal that single-hole non-liposuction NIR endoscopic axillary SLNB is not inferior to open SLNB and may be an appropriate option for patients with early breast cancer who desire breast preservation with fewer incisions. TRIAL REGISTRATION This retrospective study was "retrospectively registered" at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology (no. 2020105) and in National Medical Research Registration and Archival Information System ( https//www.medicalresearch.org.cn , number MR-44-21-004727).
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Laparoscopía / Herida Quirúrgica Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Surg Oncol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Laparoscopía / Herida Quirúrgica Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Surg Oncol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article
...