Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Severity of Local Skin Reactions with 4% 5-Fluorouracil Plus Emollient versus 4% 5-Fluorouracil Alone in Patients with Actinic Keratosis: A Single-Blind Randomised Trial.
Stockfleth, Eggert; Jouary, Thomas; Farnetani, Francesca; Pascual, Antonio Macaya; De Almeida Agudo, Cecilia; Voisard, Jean-Jacques; Bégeault, Nathalie; Delarue, Alain.
Afiliación
  • Stockfleth E; Kath. Klinikum Bochum St. Josef-Hospital, Gudrunstraße 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany.
  • Jouary T; CH Pau, Service de Dermatologie, 4 Bd Hauterive, 64000, Pau, France.
  • Farnetani F; Department of Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
  • Pascual AM; Centre Medic Congres, Carrer de Pardo, 8, 08030, Barcelona, Spain.
  • De Almeida Agudo C; Pierre Fabre, 33 Avenue E. Zola, 92100, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
  • Voisard JJ; Pierre Fabre SA, Les Cauquillous, 81500, Lavaur, France.
  • Bégeault N; Pierre Fabre SA, Les Cauquillous, 81500, Lavaur, France. nathalie.rouziq@pierre-fabre.com.
  • Delarue A; Pierre Fabre SA, Les Cauquillous, 81500, Lavaur, France.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) ; 13(4): 1013-1027, 2023 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36856965
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-containing treatments are effective for actinic keratosis (AK); however, they frequently lead to transient local skin reactions (LSRs), which often result in treatment non-adherence.

METHODS:

The aim of this international, phase IV clinical trial was to investigate whether addition of an emollient to topical 4% 5-FU would reduce the frequency and severity of LSRs over 4 weeks of treatment (intervention group) compared with 4% 5-FU alone (control group) in patients with AK. The primary objective was to assess the severity of LSRs (i.e. erythema, flaking/scaling, crusting, swelling, vesiculation/pustulation and erosion/ulceration) at week 4 of treatment (or before, in case of a major local reaction). Key secondary objectives were LSR total scores at weeks 2 and 8, the scores of individual LSR items at each visit, and the proportions of patients with 100% and ≥ 75% AK lesion clearance at week 8.

RESULTS:

In total, 141 patients were included in the efficacy analysis (71 in the intervention group and 70 in the control group). There were no statistically or clinically significant differences between the treatment groups in terms of LSR total score at week 4 (overall and by subgroups defined by the number of lesions and patient age at baseline), scores of individual LSR items at any time point, and AK lesion clearance rates at week 8. LSR scores with topical 4% 5-FU alone were lower than expected. Skin reactions were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events in both groups, leading to treatment discontinuation in nine patients (12.3%) in the intervention group and seven (9.9%) in the control group. No new safety signals were observed with the addition of an emollient to 4% 5-FU.

CONCLUSIONS:

Daily emollient applications during the 4-week treatment course did not impact the safety and efficacy profile of 4% 5-FU.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania