In vivo administration of gut bacterial consortia replicates urolithin metabotypes A and B in a non-urolithin-producing rat model.

Urolithin (Uro) production capacity and, consequently, at least partly, the health effects attributed to ellagitannin and ellagic acid consumption vary among individuals. The reason is that not all individuals have the gut bacterial ecology needed to produce the different Uro metabolites. Three human urolithin metabotypes (UM-A, UM-B, and UM-0) based on dissimilar Uro production profiles have been described in populations worldwide. Recently, the gut bacterial consortia involved in ellagic acid metabolism to yield the urolithin-producing metabotypes (UM-A and UM-B) in vitro have been identified. However, the ability of these bacterial consortia to customize urolithin production to mimic UM-A and UM-B in vivo is still unknown. In the present study, two bacterial consortia were assessed for their capacity to colonize the intestine of rats and convert UM-0 (Uro non-producers) animals into Uro-producers that mimic UM-A and UM-B, respectively. Two consortia of Uro-producing bacteria were orally administered to non-urolithin-producing Wistar rats for 4 weeks. Uro-producing bacterial strains effectively colonized the rats' gut, and the ability to produce Uros was also effectively transferred. Bacterial strains were well tolerated. No changes in other gut bacteria, except Streptococcus reduction, or adverse effects on haematological and biochemical parameters were observed. Besides, two novel qPCR procedures were designed and successfully optimized to detect and quantify Ellagibacter and Enterocloster genera in faecal samples. These results suggest that the bacterial consortia are safe and could be potential probiotics for human trials, which is especially relevant for UM-0 individuals, who cannot produce bioactive Uros.