Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In vitro activity of eravacycline and comparator agents against bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with cancer.
Rolston, Kenneth; Gerges, Bahgat; Nesher, Lior; Shelburne, Samuel A; Prince, Randall; Raad, Issam.
Afiliación
  • Rolston K; Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcomb Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Gerges B; Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcomb Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Nesher L; Infectious Disease Institute, Soroka Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheba, Israel.
  • Shelburne SA; Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcomb Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Prince R; Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcomb Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Raad I; Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcomb Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
JAC Antimicrob Resist ; 5(2): dlad020, 2023 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36875177
ABSTRACT

Background:

Bacterial infections are common in patients with cancer, and many bacteria have developed resistance to currently used antibiotics.

Objectives:

We evaluated the in vitro activity of eravacycline (a recently developed fluorocycline) and comparators against bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with cancer.

Methods:

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using CLSI-approved methodology and interpretive criteria for 255 Gram-positive and 310 Gram-negative bacteria. MIC and susceptibility percentage were calculated according to CLSI and FDA breakpoints when available.

Results:

Eravacycline had potent activity against most Gram-positive bacteria, including MRSA. Of 80 Gram-positive isolates with available breakpoints, 74 (92.5%) were susceptible to eravacycline. Eravacycline had potent activity against most Enterobacterales, including ESBL-producing organisms. Of 230 Gram-negative isolates with available breakpoints, 201 (87.4%) were susceptible to eravacycline. Eravacycline had the best activity among comparators against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, with 83% susceptibility. Eravacycline was also active against many non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria, with the lowest MIC90 value among comparators.

Conclusions:

Eravacycline was active against many clinically significant bacteria isolated from patients with cancer, including MRSA, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, and non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli. Eravacycline might play an important role in the treatment of bacterial infections in patients with cancer, and additional clinical evaluation is warranted.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: JAC Antimicrob Resist Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: JAC Antimicrob Resist Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos