Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Recovery Benefit With Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Patients Receiving Rhinoplasty.
Sagalow, Emily S; Estephan, Leonard E; Kumar, Ayan T; Hwang, Michelle; Krein, Howard; Heffelfinger, Ryan.
Afiliación
  • Sagalow ES; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Estephan LE; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Kumar AT; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Hwang M; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Krein H; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Heffelfinger R; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 169(3): 489-495, 2023 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36906818
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The aim was to evaluate the difference in recovery when comparing total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) to inhalational gas anesthesia in patients receiving rhinoplasty. STUDY

DESIGN:

Retrospective review.

SETTING:

Postoperative anesthesia care unit (PACU).

METHODS:

Patients who received a functional or cosmetic rhinoplasty at a single academic institution between April 2017 and November 2020 were included. Inhalational gas anesthesia was in the form of sevoflurane. Phase I recovery time, which was defined as the time it took a patient to reach ≥9/10 on the Aldrete scoring system was recorded, as well as the usage of pain medication in the PACU. The postoperative course and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were also collected.

RESULTS:

Two hundred and two patients were identified with 149 (73.76%) who received TIVA and 53 (26.24%) who received sevoflurane. For the patients who received TIVA, the average recovery time was 101.44 minutes (standard deviation [SD] 34.64) compared to an average recovery time of 121.09 minutes (SD 50.19) for patients who received sevoflurane leading to a difference of 19.65 minutes (p = 0.002). Patients who received TIVA experienced less PONV (p = 0.001). There were no differences in the postoperative course including surgical or anesthesia complications, postoperative complications, hospital or Emergency Department admissions, or administration of pain medication (p > 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSION:

When utilizing TIVA over inhalational anesthesia, patients undergoing rhinoplasty had significantly increased benefits in terms of reduced phase I recovery times and decreased incidence of PONV. TIVA was demonstrated to be a safe and efficacious method of anesthesia for this patient population.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Rinoplastia / Propofol / Anestésicos por Inhalación Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Asunto de la revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Rinoplastia / Propofol / Anestésicos por Inhalación Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Asunto de la revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...