Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Characterization of high-grade prostate cancer at multiparametric MRI: assessment of PI-RADS version 2.1 and version 2 descriptors across 21 readers with varying experience (MULTI study).
Di Franco, Florian; Souchon, Rémi; Crouzet, Sébastien; Colombel, Marc; Ruffion, Alain; Klich, Amna; Almeras, Mathilde; Milot, Laurent; Rabilloud, Muriel; Rouvière, Olivier.
Afiliación
  • Di Franco F; Hospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Imaging, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, 69437, Lyon, France.
  • Souchon R; INSERM, LabTau, U1032, Lyon, France.
  • Crouzet S; INSERM, LabTau, U1032, Lyon, France.
  • Colombel M; Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
  • Ruffion A; Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Lyon, France.
  • Klich A; Hospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Urology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, 69437, Lyon, France.
  • Almeras M; Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
  • Milot L; Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Lyon, France.
  • Rabilloud M; Hospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Urology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, 69437, Lyon, France.
  • Rouvière O; Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Insights Imaging ; 14(1): 49, 2023 Mar 20.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36939970
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess PI-RADSv2.1 and PI-RADSv2 descriptors across readers with varying experience.

METHODS:

Twenty-one radiologists (7 experienced (≥ 5 years) seniors, 7 less experienced seniors and 7 juniors) assessed 240 'predefined' lesions from 159 pre-biopsy multiparametric prostate MRIs. They specified their location (peripheral, transition or central zone) and size, and scored them using PI-RADSv2.1 and PI-RADSv2 descriptors. They also described and scored 'additional' lesions if needed. Per-lesion analysis assessed the 'predefined' lesions, using targeted biopsy as reference; per-lobe analysis included 'predefined' and 'additional' lesions, using combined systematic and targeted biopsy as reference. Areas under the curve (AUCs) quantified the performance in diagnosing clinically significant cancer (csPCa; ISUP ≥ 2 cancer). Kappa coefficients (κ) or concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) assessed inter-reader agreement.

RESULTS:

At per-lesion analysis, inter-reader agreement on location and size was moderate-to-good (κ = 0.60-0.73) and excellent (CCC ≥ 0.80), respectively. Agreement on PI-RADSv2.1 scoring was moderate (κ = 0.43-0.47) for seniors and fair (κ = 0.39) for juniors. Using PI-RADSv2.1, juniors obtained a significantly lower AUC (0.74; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.70-0.79) than experienced seniors (0.80; 95%CI 0.76-0.84; p = 0.008) but not than less experienced seniors (0.74; 95%CI 0.70-0.78; p = 0.75). As compared to PI-RADSv2, PI-RADSv2.1 downgraded 17 lesions/reader (interquartile range [IQR] 6-29), of which 2 (IQR 1-3) were csPCa; it upgraded 4 lesions/reader (IQR 2-7), of which 1 (IQR 0-2) was csPCa. Per-lobe analysis, which included 60 (IQR 25-73) 'additional' lesions/reader, yielded similar results.

CONCLUSIONS:

Experience significantly impacted lesion characterization using PI-RADSv2.1 descriptors. As compared to PI-RADSv2, PI-RADSv2.1 tended to downgrade non-csPCa lesions, but this effect was small and variable across readers.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Insights Imaging Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Insights Imaging Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia
...