Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of sugammadex versus neostigmine on postoperative nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia in adult patients:a single-center retrospective study.
Ju, Jae-Woo; Hwang, In Eob; Cho, Hye-Yeon; Yang, Seong Mi; Kim, Won Ho; Lee, Ho-Jin.
Afiliación
  • Ju JW; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
  • Hwang IE; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
  • Cho HY; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Yang SM; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim WH; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee HJ; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 5422, 2023 04 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37012336
We aimed to compare the effect of sugammadex to that of neostigmine with respect to the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) during the first 24 h following general anesthesia. This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia in 2020 at an academic medical center in Seoul, South Korea. The exposure groups were determined according to whether the patient received sugammadex or neostigmine as a reversal agent. The primary outcome was PONV occurrence during the first 24 h postoperatively (overall). The association between the type of reversal agent and primary outcome was investigated using logistic regression while adjusting for confounding variables using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW). Of the 10,912 patients included in this study, 5,918 (54.2%) received sugammadex. Sugammadex was associated with a significantly lower incidence of overall PONV (15.8% vs. 17.7%; odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.97; P = 0.010) after sIPTW. In conclusion, compared with neostigmine/glycopyrrolate, sugammadex use has a lower risk of PONV during the first 24 h following general anesthesia.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Bloqueo Neuromuscular / Neostigmina Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Bloqueo Neuromuscular / Neostigmina Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido