Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinician experience with telemedicine at a safety-net hospital network during COVID-19: a cross-sectional survey.
Sharma, Anjana E; Khoong, Elaine C; Nijagal, Malini A; Lyles, Courtney R; Su, George; DeFries, Triveni; Sarkar, Urmimala; Tuot, Delphine.
Afiliación
  • Sharma AE; Center for Excellence in Primary Care, Dept of Family and Community Medicine, UCSF (University of California San Francisco) School of Medicine and the UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital (CVP).
  • Khoong EC; Division of General Internal Medicine, UCSF School of Medicine, and CVP.
  • Nijagal MA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, ZSFG and UCSF.
  • Lyles CR; Division of General Internal Medicine, UCSF School of Medicine, and CVP.
  • Su G; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, ZSFG and the Department of Medicine, UCSF School of Medicine.
  • DeFries T; Center for Excellence in Primary Care, Dept of Family and Community Medicine, UCSF (University of California San Francisco) School of Medicine and the UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital (CVP).
  • Sarkar U; Division of General Internal Medicine, UCSF School of Medicine, and CVP.
  • Tuot D; Division of General Internal Medicine, UCSF School of Medicine, and CVP.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 32(2 Suppl): 220-240, 2021 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37020792
ABSTRACT

Objective:

The COVID-19 pandemic prompted unprecedented expansion of telemedicine services. We sought to describe clinician experiences providing telemedicine to publicly-insured, low-income patients during COVID-19.

Methods:

Online survey of ambulatory clinicians in an urban safety-net hospital system, conducted May 28 2020-July 14 2020.

Results:

Among 311 participants (response rate 48.3%), 34.7% (N=108/311) practiced in primary/urgent care, 37.0% (N=115/311) medical specialty and 7.7% (N=24/311) surgical clinics. 87.8% (273/311) had conducted telephone visits, 26% (81/311) video. Participants reported observing both technical and non-technical patient barriers. Clinicians reported concerns about the diagnostic safety of telephone (58.9%, 129/219) vs video (35.3%, 24/68). However, clinician comfort with telemedicine was high (89.3% (216/242) for telephone, 91.0% (61/67) for video), with many clinicians (220/239 or 92.1% telephone, 60/66 or 90.9% video) planning to continue telemedicine after COVID-19.

Conclusions:

Clinicians in a safety-net healthcare system report high comfort with and intention to continue telemedicine after the pandemic, despite patient challenges and safety concerns.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prevalence_studies Aspecto: Equity_inequality Idioma: En Revista: J Health Care Poor Underserved Asunto de la revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prevalence_studies Aspecto: Equity_inequality Idioma: En Revista: J Health Care Poor Underserved Asunto de la revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article