Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Physician's Guide to the Use of Gene Expression Profile Ancillary Diagnostic Testing for Cutaneous Melanocytic Neoplasms.
Marks, Etan; Jarell, Abel; Ludzik, Joanna; Farberg, Aaron S; Rabinovitz, Harold S; Phelps, Robert G; Cockerell, Clay J; Witkowski, Alexander.
Afiliación
  • Marks E; Dr. Marks is with Dermatopathology, Kansas City University-Graduate Medical Education Consortium in Oviedo, Florida, and Advanced Dermatology and Cosmetic Surgery in Oviedo, Florida.
  • Jarell A; Dr. Jarell is with Granite State Dermatology, PC in Portsmouth, New Hampshire.
  • Ludzik J; Drs. Ludzik and Witkowski are with the Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, Oregon.
  • Farberg AS; Dr. Ludzik is also with the Department of Telemedicine and Bioinformatics, Jagiellonian University Medical College in Krakow, Poland.
  • Rabinovitz HS; Dr. Farberg is with Baylor Scott & White Health System in Dallas, Texas.
  • Phelps RG; Dr. Rabinovitz is with the Department of Dermatology, Medical College of Georgia in Augusta, Georgia.
  • Cockerell CJ; Dr. Phelps is with Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City, New York.
  • Witkowski A; Dr. Cockerell is with Cockerell Dermatopathology in Dallas, Texas and the Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, Texas.
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol ; 16(4): 12-20, 2023 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37077930
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

Some melanocytic neoplasms suspicious for melanoma require additional workup to arrive at a final diagnosis. Within the last eight years, gene expression profiling (GEP) has become an important ancillary tool to aid in the diagnosis of melanocytic neoplasms with uncertain malignant potential. As the usage of two commercially available tests (23-GEP and 35-GEP) evolves, it is important to answer key questions about optimal utilization and their impact on patient care.

Methods:

Recent and relevant articles answering the following questions were included in the review. First, how do dermatopathologists synthesize the available literature, the latest guidelines, and their clinical experience to determine which cases would be most likely to benefit from GEP testing? Second, how best can a dermatologist convey to their dermatopathologist that the use of GEP in the diagnostic process could provide a more clearly defined result and thereby help empower the dermatologist to provide higher-quality patient care when making specific patient management decisions for otherwise pathologically ambiguous lesions?

Results:

When interpreted in the context of the clinical, pathologic, and laboratory information, GEP results can facilitate the rendering of timely, accurate, and definitive diagnoses for melanocytic lesions with otherwise uncertain malignant potential to inform personalized treatment and management plans.

Limitations:

This was a narrative review focused on clinical use of GEP compared to other ancillary diagnostic tests performed postbiopsy.

Conclusion:

Open communication between dermatopathologists and dermatologists, especially regarding GEP testing, can be a vital component to achieve appropriate clinicopathologic correlation for otherwise ambiguous melanocytic lesions.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Aesthet Dermatol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Aesthet Dermatol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article