[Terminological and conceptual ambiguity of criminally-remedial regulation of the expert conclusion contents]. / Terminologicheskaya i smyslovaya neopredelennost' ugolovno-protsessual'noi reglamentatsii soderzhaniya zaklyucheniya eksperta.

ABSTRACT

Criminally-remedial law requirements to the expert conclusion are analyzed. A number of terms contained in the law that do not have an unambiguous interpretation are highlighted including the content of the expert conclusion, result, outcomes, methodology, method. The author definitions of these concepts are proposed.