Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of Hypertonic Dextrose Injection (Prolotherapy) in Plantar Fasciopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Fong, Hugo P Y; Zhu, Meng-Ting; Rabago, David P; Reeves, Kenneth D; Chung, Vincent C H; Sit, Regina W S.
Afiliación
  • Fong HPY; The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Zhu MT; The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Rabago DP; Department of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
  • Reeves KD; Private Practice, KS.
  • Chung VCH; The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Sit RWS; The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Electronic address: reginasit@cuhk.edu.hk.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 104(11): 1941-1953.e9, 2023 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37098357
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the effectiveness of hypertonic dextrose prolotherapy (DPT) in plantar fasciopathy (PF) compared with other non-surgical treatments. DATA SOURCES: PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Global Health, Ovid Nursing Database, Dimensions, and WHO ICTRP were searched from inception to April 30th, 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Two independent reviewers selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effectiveness of DPT in PF compared with non-surgical treatments. Outcomes included pain intensity, foot and ankle function, and plantar fascia thickness. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers conducted data extraction. Risk of bias (RoB) assessment was conducted using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool, and certainty of evidence was assessed with Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). DATA SYNTHESIS: Eight RCTs (n=469) met the inclusion criteria. Pooled results favored the use of DPT versus normal saline (NS) injections in reducing pain (weighted mean difference [WMD] -41.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] -62.36 to -21.08; P<.01; low certainty evidence) and improving function [WMD -39.04; 95% CI -55.24 to -22.85; P<.01; low certainty evidence] in the medium term. Pooled results also showed corticosteroid (CS) injections was superior to DPT in reducing pain in the short term [standardized mean difference 0.77; 95% CI 0.40 to 1.14; P<.01; moderate certainty evidence]. Overall RoB varied from "some concerns" to "high". The overall certainty of evidence presented ranges from very low to moderate based on the assessment with the GRADE approach. CONCLUSION: Low certainty evidence demonstrated that DPT was superior to NS injections in reducing pain and improving function in the medium term, but moderate certainty evidence showed that it was inferior to CS in reducing pain in the short term. Further high-quality RCTs with standard protocol, longer-term follow-up, and adequate sample size are needed to confirm its role in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fascitis Plantar / Proloterapia Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fascitis Plantar / Proloterapia Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos