Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Effect of Tibial Tunnel Drilling Technique on Retained Intra-Articular Bone Debris Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Batty, Lachlan; Huntington, Lachlan S; Chung, Timothy; Spiers, Libby; Tulloch, Scott; Webster, Kate E; Tran, Phong.
Afiliación
  • Batty L; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western Health, Footscray Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Huntington LS; School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Chung T; OrthoSport Victoria Research Unit, Epworth Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Spiers L; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western Health, Footscray Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Tulloch S; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western Health, Footscray Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Webster KE; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western Health, Footscray Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Tran P; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western Health, Footscray Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil ; 5(2): e337-e343, 2023 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37101881
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

To assess the effect of tibial tunnel drilling technique (retro-drilled bone socket vs full tibial tunnel) on the presence and grade of postoperative, intra-articular bone debris following primary hamstring anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Methods:

This was a retrospective cohort study of primary hamstring autograft ACL reconstructions performed by 2 surgeons. Two blinded independent reviewers assessed the presence and length of retained intra-articular bone debris on the immediate postoperative lateral radiograph. Debris was graded according to a predefined 5-point ordinal grading system grade 0 (no debris) to IV (severe debris). Results were analyzed according to the type of tibial tunnel; retro-drilled socket or full tibial tunnel using Kappa statistics and the Mann-Whitney U test.

Results:

Sixty-five patients undergoing primary hamstring ACL were included (39 tibial socket 26 full tibial tunnel). Bone debris was observed among the tibial socket technique in 29 of 39 instances (74.3%), compared with 14 of 26 (53.8%) instances for the full tibial tunnel technique (P = .09). Where there was measurable debris present, the tibial socket group had a mean length of bone debris of 13.7 ± 6.2 mm as compared with the full tibial tunnel, 10.0 ± 4.7 mm (P = .165). There were significant differences in bone debris gradings between the 2 treatment groups, with tibial sockets having an overall greater grade (P = .04).

Conclusions:

A difference in the presence of, or length of, retained bone debris on the postoperative lateral radiograph was not demonstrated between the retro-drilled bone socket and full tibial tunnel techniques. However, when bone debris was present, greater grades of debris were seen in the retro-drilled socket group. Level of Evidence III, retrospective, comparative study.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia