Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The SciQA Scientific Question Answering Benchmark for Scholarly Knowledge.
Auer, Sören; Barone, Dante A C; Bartz, Cassiano; Cortes, Eduardo G; Jaradeh, Mohamad Yaser; Karras, Oliver; Koubarakis, Manolis; Mouromtsev, Dmitry; Pliukhin, Dmitrii; Radyush, Daniil; Shilin, Ivan; Stocker, Markus; Tsalapati, Eleni.
Afiliación
  • Auer S; TIB-Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology, Hannover, Germany.
  • Barone DAC; L3S Research Center, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
  • Bartz C; Institute of Informatics, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • Cortes EG; Institute of Informatics, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • Jaradeh MY; Institute of Informatics, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • Karras O; TIB-Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology, Hannover, Germany.
  • Koubarakis M; L3S Research Center, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
  • Mouromtsev D; TIB-Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology, Hannover, Germany. oliver.karras@tib.eu.
  • Pliukhin D; Department of Informatics and Telecommunications, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Radyush D; Laboratory of Information Science and Semantic Technologies, ITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • Shilin I; Laboratory of Information Science and Semantic Technologies, ITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • Stocker M; Laboratory of Information Science and Semantic Technologies, ITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • Tsalapati E; Laboratory of Information Science and Semantic Technologies, ITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 7240, 2023 May 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37142627
Knowledge graphs have gained increasing popularity in the last decade in science and technology. However, knowledge graphs are currently relatively simple to moderate semantic structures that are mainly a collection of factual statements. Question answering (QA) benchmarks and systems were so far mainly geared towards encyclopedic knowledge graphs such as DBpedia and Wikidata. We present SciQA a scientific QA benchmark for scholarly knowledge. The benchmark leverages the Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) which includes almost 170,000 resources describing research contributions of almost 15,000 scholarly articles from 709 research fields. Following a bottom-up methodology, we first manually developed a set of 100 complex questions that can be answered using this knowledge graph. Furthermore, we devised eight question templates with which we automatically generated further 2465 questions, that can also be answered with the ORKG. The questions cover a range of research fields and question types and are translated into corresponding SPARQL queries over the ORKG. Based on two preliminary evaluations, we show that the resulting SciQA benchmark represents a challenging task for next-generation QA systems. This task is part of the open competitions at the 22nd International Semantic Web Conference 2023 as the Scholarly Question Answering over Linked Data (QALD) Challenge.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania Pais de publicación: Reino Unido