Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient Breathing Motion and Delivery Specifics Influencing the Robustness of a Proton Pancreas Irradiation.
Knäusl, Barbara; Lebbink, Franciska; Fossati, Piero; Engwall, Erik; Georg, Dietmar; Stock, Markus.
Afiliación
  • Knäusl B; Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
  • Lebbink F; MedAustron Ion Therapy Centre, Medical Physics, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
  • Fossati P; Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
  • Engwall E; MedAustron Ion Therapy Centre, Medical Physics, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
  • Georg D; MedAustron Ion Therapy Centre, Medical Physics, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
  • Stock M; Division Medical Physics, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(9)2023 Apr 29.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37174016
ABSTRACT
Motion compensation strategies in particle therapy depend on the anatomy, motion amplitude and underlying beam delivery technology. This retrospective study on pancreas patients with small moving tumours analysed existing treatment concepts and serves as a basis for future treatment strategies for patients with larger motion amplitudes as well as the transition towards carbon ion treatments. The dose distributions of 17 hypofractionated proton treatment plans were analysed using 4D dose tracking (4DDT). The recalculation of clinical treatment plans employing robust optimisation for mitigating different organ fillings was performed on phased-based 4D computed tomography (4DCT) data considering the accelerator (pulsed scanned pencil beams delivered by a synchrotron) and the breathing-time structure. The analysis confirmed the robustness of the included treatment plans concerning the interplay of beam and organ motion. The median deterioration of D50% (ΔD50%) for the clinical target volume (CTV) and the planning target volume (PTV) was below 2%, while the only outlier was observed for ΔD98% with -35.1%. The average gamma pass rate over all treatment plans (2%/ 2 mm) was 88.8% ± 8.3, while treatment plans for motion amplitudes larger than 1 mm performed worse. For organs at risk (OARs), the median ΔD2% was below 3%, but for single patients, essential changes, e.g., up to 160% for the stomach were observed. The hypofractionated proton treatment for pancreas patients based on robust treatment plan optimisation and 2 to 4 horizontal and vertical beams showed to be robust against intra-fractional movements up to 3.7 mm. It could be demonstrated that the patient's orientation did not influence the motion sensitivity. The identified outliers showed the need for continuous 4DDT calculations in clinical practice to identify patient cases with more significant deviations.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Austria

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Austria