Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A classifier-combined method for grading breast cancer based on Dempster-Shafer evidence theory.
Liu, Zhou; Lin, Fuliang; Huang, Junhui; Wu, Xia; Wen, Jie; Wang, Meng; Ren, Ya; Wei, Xiaoer; Song, Xinyu; Qin, Jing; Lee, Elaine Yuen-Phin; Shao, Dan; Wang, Yixiang; Cheng, Xiaoguang; Hu, Zhanli; Luo, Dehong; Zhang, Na.
Afiliación
  • Liu Z; Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
  • Lin F; Paul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
  • Huang J; School of Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
  • Wu X; Paul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
  • Wen J; Paul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
  • Wang M; Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
  • Ren Y; Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
  • Wei X; Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
  • Song X; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
  • Qin J; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
  • Lee EY; Centre for Smart Health, School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
  • Shao D; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical School of Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Wang Y; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
  • Cheng X; Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin Hong Kong SAR, China.
  • Hu Z; Department of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Luo D; Paul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
  • Zhang N; Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Quant Imaging Med Surg ; 13(5): 3288-3297, 2023 May 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37179927
Background: Preoperative non-invasive histologic grading of breast cancer is essential. This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of a machine learning classification method based on Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory for the histologic grading of breast cancer. Methods: A total of 489 contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) slices with breast cancer lesions (including 171 grade Ⅰ, 140 grade Ⅱ, and 178 grade Ⅲ lesions) were used for analysis. All the lesions were segmented by two radiologists in consensus. For each slice, the quantitative pharmacokinetic parameters based on a modified Tofts model and the textural features of the segmented lesion on the image were extracted. Principal component analysis was then used to reduce feature dimensionality and obtain new features from the pharmacokinetic parameters and texture features. The basic confidence assignments of different classifiers were combined using D-S evidence theory based on the accuracy of three classifiers: support vector machine (SVM), Random Forest, and k-nearest neighbor (KNN). The performance of the machine learning techniques was evaluated in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve. Results: The three classifiers showed varying accuracy across different categories. The accuracy of using D-S evidence theory in combination with multiple classifiers reached 92.86%, which was higher than that of using SVM (82.76%), Random Forest (78.85%), or KNN (87.82%) individually. The average area under the curve of using the D-S evidence theory combined with multiple classifiers reached 0.896, which was larger than that of using SVM (0.829), Random Forest (0.727), or KNN (0.835) individually. Conclusions: Multiple classifiers can be effectively combined based on D-S evidence theory to improve the prediction of histologic grade in breast cancer.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Quant Imaging Med Surg Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Quant Imaging Med Surg Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: China