Evaluation of lower limb and pelvic marker placement precision among different evaluators and its impact on gait kinematics computed with the Conventional Gait Model.

BACKGROUND: Gait analysis relies on the accurate and precise identification of anatomical landmarks to provide reliable and reproducible data. More specifically, the precision of marker placement among repeated measurements is responsible for increased variability in the output gait data. RESEARCH QUESTION: The objective of this study was to quantify the precision of marker placement on the lower limbs by a test-retest procedure and to investigate its propagation to kinematic data. METHODS: The protocol was tested on a cohort of eight asymptomatic adults involving four evaluators, with different levels of experience. Each evaluator performed, three repeated marker placements for each participant. The standard deviation was used to calculate the precision of the marker placement, the precision of the orientation of the anatomical (segment) coordinate systems, and the precision of the lower limb kinematics. In addition, one-way ANOVA was used to compare the intra-evaluator marker placement precision and kinematic precisions among the different levels of the evaluator's experience. Finally, a Pearson correlation between marker placement precision and kinematic precision was analyzed. RESULTS: Results have shown a precision of skin markers within 10 mm and 12 mm for intra-evaluator and inter-evaluator, respectively. Analysis of kinematic data showed good to moderate reliability for all parameters apart from hip and knee rotation that demonstrated poor intra- and inter-evaluator precision. Inter-trial variability was observed reduced than intra- and inter-evaluator variability. Moreover, experience had a positive impact on kinematic reliability since evaluators with higher experience showed a statistically significant increase in precision for most kinematic parameters. However, no correlation was observed between marker placement precision and kinematic precision which indicates that an error in the placement of one specific marker can be compensated or enhanced, in a non-linear way, by an error in the placement of other markers.