Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Vacuum-assisted access sheath in supine mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL).
Szczesniewski, J J; Boronat Catalá, J; García-Cano Fernández, A M; Rodríguez Castro, P M; Torres Pérez, D; Llanes González, L.
Afiliación
  • Szczesniewski JJ; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: juliusz.szcz@gmail.com.
  • Boronat Catalá J; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Madrid, Spain.
  • García-Cano Fernández AM; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Madrid, Spain.
  • Rodríguez Castro PM; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Madrid, Spain.
  • Torres Pérez D; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Madrid, Spain.
  • Llanes González L; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Madrid, Spain; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) ; 47(10): 681-687, 2023 Dec.
Article en En, Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37355205
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The vacuum-assisted access sheath is a new device for the treatment of kidney stones with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

OBJECTIVE:

Our aim was to compare the stone-free rate (SFR) and complications between standard mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini-PCNL) and vacuum-assisted PCNL (Va-PCNL).

METHODS:

Retrospective study of patients undergoing Mini-PCNL and Va-PCNL from January 2018 to June 2022. Va-PCNL was performed with a disposable sheath (ClearPetra®) with continuous high-flow irrigation and vacuum fluid dynamics for easier stone fragment removal. Baseline patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, perioperative and postoperative data were collected. We compared SFR and complications.

RESULTS:

A total of 136 patients were identified, 57 (41,9%) underwent Va-PCNL and 79 (58,15%) Mini-PCNL. Mean operative time was significantly shorter in the Va-PCNL group (95 min.) than in Mini-PCNL (146 min; P = ,001) group. The tubeless technique was performed more frequently in Va-PCNL group (61,4% vs. 34,2%; P = ,002). We did not observe any differences in postoperative complications. The mean hospital stay was significantly lower in Va-PCNL with 1,7 ± 1,9 days per patient compared with 2,7 ± 1,5 days in the Mini-PCNL group (P = ,001). There were no differences in SFR at 3 months between Va-PCNL (71,9%) and Mini-PCNL (71,8%; P =v ,848).

CONCLUSION:

Patients treated with Va-PCNL had comparable results to Mini-PCNL, showing equal SFR with similar infectious complications rates. Potential benefits of Va-PCNL include shorter operative time and postoperative stay.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cálculos Renales / Nefrolitotomía Percutánea Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En / Es Revista: Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cálculos Renales / Nefrolitotomía Percutánea Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En / Es Revista: Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article