Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Statistical Considerations and Software for Designing Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trials (SMART) with a Survival Final Endpoint.
Kravets, Sasha; Ruppert, Amy S; Jacobson, Sawyer B; Le-Rademacher, Jennifer G; Mandrekar, Sumithra J.
Afiliación
  • Kravets S; Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Ruppert AS; Department of Statistics, Oncology, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Jacobson SB; Division of Hematology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
  • Le-Rademacher JG; Department of Advanced Analytics & Data Science,C.H. Rob Inson, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, USA.
  • Mandrekar SJ; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
J Biopharm Stat ; : 1-14, 2023 Jul 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37434437
ABSTRACT
Sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART) designs are appropriate for comparing adaptive treatment interventions, in which intermediate outcomes (called tailoring variables) guide subsequent treatment decisions for individual patients. Within a SMART design, patients may be re-randomized to subsequent treatments following the outcomes of their intermediate assessments. In this paper, we provide an overview of statistical considerations necessary to design and implement a two-stage SMART design with a binary tailoring variable and a survival final endpoint. A chronic lymphocytic leukemia trial with a final endpoint of progression-free survival is used as an example for the simulations to assess how design parameters, including, choice of randomization ratios for each stage of randomization, and response rates of the tailoring variable affect the statistical power. We assess the choice of weights from restricted re-randomization on data analyses and appropriate hazard rate assumptions. Specifically, for a given first-stage therapy and prior to the tailoring variable assessment, we assume equal hazard rates for all patients randomized to a treatment arm. After the tailoring variable assessment, individual hazard rates are assumed for each intervention path. Simulation studies demonstrate that the response rate of the binary tailoring variable impacts power as it directly impacts the distribution of patients. We also confirm that when the first stage randomization is 11, it is not necessary to consider the first stage randomization ratio when applying the weights. We provide an R-shiny application for obtaining power for a given sample size for SMART designs.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Biopharm Stat Asunto de la revista: FARMACOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Biopharm Stat Asunto de la revista: FARMACOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos