Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Left Atrial Appendage Closure Outcomes in Patients With Cancer at a Single Tertiary Center.
Kumar, Sundeep; Yoon, SungHan; Milioglou, Ioannis; Tashtish, Nour; Farmakis, Ioannis; Dallan, Luis Augusto Palma; Mogalapalli, Akhil; Arruda, Mauricio; Filby, Steven J.
Afiliación
  • Kumar S; Division of Cardiology, Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute.
  • Yoon S; Division of Cardiology, Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute.
  • Milioglou I; Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Tashtish N; Division of Cardiology, Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute.
  • Farmakis I; Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Dallan LAP; Division of Cardiology, Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute.
  • Mogalapalli A; Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Arruda M; Division of Cardiology, Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute.
  • Filby SJ; Division of Cardiology, Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute. Electronic address: Steven.Filby@UHhospitals.org.
Am J Cardiol ; 202: 176-181, 2023 09 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37441832
ABSTRACT
Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in patients with underlying malignancy. Patients with cancer have a higher risk of bleeding, and at the same time, carry an elevated risk of thromboembolism related to the hypercoagulable state, type of cancer, and anticancer treatment, rendering safe anticoagulation challenging in this population. Left atrial appendage closure is an alternative treatment option in patients with atrial fibrillation and high bleeding risk; however, the data on patients with cancer are limited. Our study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes in patients with cancer receiving left atrial appendage closure using the WATCHMAN device. This is a prospective, single-center study comparing outcomes in 389 patients who underwent percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using the WATCHMAN device over 5 years in a single, large academic hospital in the United States. The postprocedural outcomes of mortality, stroke, and major bleeding were evaluated in patients with and without cancer. Our study included 57 patients with cancer and 332 without cancer. The baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Metastatic disease was present in 16.4% of patients, and 25% were receiving active treatment at the time of the procedure. The median follow-up time was 354 (interquartile range 85 to 790) days. There was no difference in mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72 to 2.35, p = 0.38), major bleeding episodes (HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.45 to 3.33, p = 0.68), and stroke (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.19 to 2.21, p = 0.49) at 3 years after the procedure in patients with and without cancer. There was no difference in the composite outcome (postprocedural mortality, stroke, and major bleeding) between the 2 groups (HR 1.25, CI 0.75 to 2.07, p = 0.38). Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in patients with cancer appears to be safe and has a similar long-term risk compared with patients without cancer.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fibrilación Atrial / Apéndice Atrial / Accidente Cerebrovascular / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Cardiol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fibrilación Atrial / Apéndice Atrial / Accidente Cerebrovascular / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Cardiol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article