Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation in endurance athletes: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Prasitlumkum, Narut; Tokavanich, Nithi; Siranart, Noppachai; Techasatian, Witina; Cheungpasitporn, Wisit; Navaravong, Leenhapong; Chokesuwattanaskul, Ronpichai.
Afiliación
  • Prasitlumkum N; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Tokavanich N; Sparrow Hospital, Michigan State University, Lansing, MI, USA.
  • Siranart N; Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Techasatian W; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA.
  • Cheungpasitporn W; Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Navaravong L; Department of Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake, UT, USA.
  • Chokesuwattanaskul R; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand. drronpichaic@gmail.com.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol ; 67(2): 329-339, 2024 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37466821
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Atrial fibrillation (AF) management in endurance athletes (EA) is challenging due to the paucity of data, especially on the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation (CA). The hypothesis is that the efficacy and safety of AF CA in EA are comparable to the non-EA.

METHODS:

Databases from EMBASE, Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane were searched from inception through February 2023. Studies with available information on efficacy and safety profiles were included. Effect estimates from the individual studies were extracted and combined using random effect and generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird.

RESULTS:

Nine observational studies with a total of 1129 participants were identified, of whom 51% were EA. Our analysis found that rate of atrial arrhythmia (AA) recurrences following AF CA was not statistically different between EA and non-EA (RR 1.04, I2 = 57.6%, p = 0.54). The AA survival rates after a single ablation in EA was 60.2%, which improved up to 77% after multiple ablations during the follow-up period. Infrequent complication rates ranging from 0 to 7.6% were observed, with no mortality.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our meta-analysis suggests that AF CA is as effective and safe in EA as in non-EA. In the future, AF CA should be considered as a first-line therapeutic choice in this patient group.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fibrilación Atrial / Ablación por Catéter Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Asunto de la revista: CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fibrilación Atrial / Ablación por Catéter Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Asunto de la revista: CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos