Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Microbial genome (Illumina MiSeq) sequencing of drinking water treatment residuals to evaluate compatibility with environmental applications.
Turner, Tomi; Tonge, Daniel; Glanville, Helen C; Wheeler, Rebecca; Oliver, Ian W.
Afiliación
  • Turner T; School of Geography, Geology and the Environment, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG, UK.
  • Tonge D; School of Life Sciences, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG, UK.
  • Glanville HC; School of Geography, Geology and the Environment, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG, UK.
  • Wheeler R; School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Loughborough University, LE11 3TU, Loughborough, UK.
  • Oliver IW; 4R Group, Control House, A1 Business Park, Knottingley Road, Knottingley, WF11 0BU, UK.
Environ Monit Assess ; 195(9): 1027, 2023 Aug 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37553528
ABSTRACT
The clarification of drinking water leads to the production of large quantities of water treatment residuals (WTRs). DNA was extracted from six WTR samples collected from water treatment plants within the UK to compare their bacterial communities and examine whether factors such as coagulant usage (aluminium versus iron salt), the type of water source (reservoir or river), or leachable chemical composition influence these communities. Bacterial 16S variable region 4 (V4) was amplified and sequenced using Illumina MiSeq sequencing. The most abundant phyla in WTR samples were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria, and Firmicutes, collectively representing 92.77-97.8% of the total bacterial sequences. Statistical analysis of microbial profiles indicated that water source played a significant role in microbial community structure, diversity, and richness, however coagulant type did not. PERMANOVA analysis showed that no single chemical variable (pH, organic matter, or extractable element concentration) influenced microbial composition significantly; however, canonical correspondence analysis of WTR microbiomes yielded a model using all these variables that could be used to explain variations in microbial community structures of WTRs (p < 0.05). No common, potentially toxic cyanobacteria, or related pathogens of concern were found. Analysis with PICRUSt showed that WTRs all had similar predicted microbial functional profiles. Overall, the results indicate that WTRs analysed in this study are unlikely to pose any threat to soil microbial community structure when applied to land as a soil conditioner or enhancer and may help to enhance the soil microbial community.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Agua Potable / Cianobacterias / Purificación del Agua Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Environ Monit Assess Asunto de la revista: SAUDE AMBIENTAL Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Agua Potable / Cianobacterias / Purificación del Agua Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Environ Monit Assess Asunto de la revista: SAUDE AMBIENTAL Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido