First Report of Bacterial Leaf Blight caused by Enterobacter asburiae on Sorghum in Jiangsu Province, China.

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench) is a major cereal crop in China, with a planting area of more than 674666 ha in 2021. In August 2022, bacterial leaf blight symptoms were observed on sorghum plants grown in a field in Huai'an (119.30437 ºE, 33.999644 ºN), in Jiangsu Province (Fig. 1). To determine the causal agent, four symptomatic leaves from different plants were surface sterilized with 75% (v/v) ethanol for 1 min and washed three times with ddH2O. The surface-sterilized plant tissues were cut into small pieces (4 × 4 mm in size) and cultured on Nutrient Agar (NA) plates at 28ºC for 24 h. To obtain pure cultures, these colonies were transferred to fresh NA plates by using the conventional streak plate method. The purified bacterial cells were rod-shaped, from 1.14 to 1.66 µm long, and from 0.61 to 0.86 µm wide (number of observations = 31) (Fig. 2). Three isolates were used for further characterization. The Gram stain test indicated that the three isolates were Gram negative. 16S rRNA (27F/1492R primers) and gyrB (UP1/Up2r) genes were amplified and sequenced (Marchesi et al. 1998; Yamamoto and Harayama 1995). The obtained 16S rRNA (0R143361-0R143363) and gyrB sequences (0R146993-0R146995) were submitted to GenBank. The 16S rRNA sequences of the three isolated strains showed over 98% identity (1447/1462, 1438/1462 and 1443/1460 bp) to the E. asburiae reference strains ENIPBJ CG1, CAV1043 and 1808 013 (CP014993.1, CP011591.1 and AP019632.1, respectively). Similarly, the gyrB sequences of the three strains showed 98% identity (1103/1129, 1105/1129 and 1108/1129 bp) to the same E. asburiae reference strains. Four-week-old sorghum plants were used in the pathogenicity tests. A phylogenetic tree was constructed with reference strains (Hoffmann et al., 2005). The healthy leaves were inoculated with bacterial suspensions of the three bacterial isolates (OD600 = 0.6~1.0) using the leaf cutting method (Kauffman et al. 1973). For the control group, sterilized ddH2O was used. Each isolate was inoculated in three healthy plants. Inoculated plants were incubated at 28ºC and 75% humidity with alternating 12-h light and 12-h dark cycles with a photon flux density of 200 mmol/m2/s. After 10 days, bacterial leaf blight symptoms were observed in all the inoculated leaves. The inoculated leaves showed severe browning near the inoculation site (1-2 cm), and advanced yellowing from 2 to 7 cm from the inoculation site, while no symptoms were found in control group. The pathogen was recovered from the infected leaves, and its identity was confirmed by 16S rRNA/gyrB sequencing and morphological analysis, fulfilling Koch's postulates (Fig 2). To our knowledge, this is the first report of E. asburiae causing bacterial leaf blight on sorghum worldwide. This species is a well-known pathogen of humans that can cause nosocomial infections (Markovska et al. 2019; Zhu et al. 2017). Recently, E. asburiae was identified as the causal agent of bacterial blight on rice and tuber rot on radish (Wang et al. 2023; Yu et al. 2021). The emergence E. asburiae as a plant pathogen may be produced by the numerous resistant strains reported during recent years. Pantoea ananatis has been reported as a common companion pathogen of E. asburiae (Xue et al. 2021). This report will help to better understand the host promiscuity of E. asburiae and reveals a new pathogen that affects sorghum production in China. This study also serves as a basis for future studies to develop management strategies and cultivation for the disease to prevent sorghum yield loss. As far as we know, no control method for the management of this new plant pathogen was reported to date, which highlights the potential hazard of this discovery. Reference Hoffmann, H., et al. 2005. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 28:196. Kauffman, H. E., et al. 1973. Plant Dis. Rep. 57:537. Marchesi, J. R., et al. 1998. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:795. Markovska, R., et al. 2019. Infect. Dis. 51:627. Wang, R., et al. 2023. Plant Dis. in press. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-11-22-2650-PDN Xue, Y., et al. 2021. Plant Dis. 105:2078. Yamamoto, S., et al. 1995. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:1104. Yu, L., et al. 2021. Plant Dis. 106:310. Zhu, B., et al. 2017. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 8:104.