Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sex Differences in Resting Metabolic Rate among Athletes and Association with Body Composition Parameters: A Follow-Up Investigation.
Jagim, Andrew R; Jones, Margaret T; Askow, Andrew T; Luedke, Joel; Erickson, Jacob L; Fields, Jennifer B; Kerksick, Chad M.
Afiliación
  • Jagim AR; Sports Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, Onalaska, WI 54650, USA.
  • Jones MT; Patriot Performance Laboratory, Frank Pettrone Center for Sports Performance, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
  • Askow AT; Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI 54601, USA.
  • Luedke J; Patriot Performance Laboratory, Frank Pettrone Center for Sports Performance, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
  • Erickson JL; Sport, Recreation, and Tourism Management, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
  • Fields JB; Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61820, USA.
  • Kerksick CM; Sports Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, Onalaska, WI 54650, USA.
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol ; 8(3)2023 Aug 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37606404
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to examine sex differences in resting metabolic rate (RMR) and associations between measured RMR and body composition parameters in athletes. One-hundred and ninety collegiate men (n = 98; age 20.1 ± 1.6 yr.; body mass 92.7 ± 17.5 kg; height 181.6 ± 6.2 cm, body mass index 28.0 ± 4.7 kg/m2) and women (n = 92; age 19.4 ± 1.1 yr.; body mass 65.2 ± 11.0 kg; height 168.0 ± 6.6 cm, body mass index 23.0 ± 3.6 kg/m2) athletes volunteered to participate in this study. Athletes completed a body composition assessment using air displacement plethysmography and RMR using indirect calorimetry. Assessments were completed in a fasted state and after refraining from intense physical activity > 24 h prior to testing. Data were collected during the 2016-2019 seasons. Men had a higher RMR compared to women (2595 ± 433 vs. 1709 ± 308 kcals; p < 0.001); however, when adjusted for body mass (p = 0.064) and fat-free mass (p = 0.084), the observed differences were not significant. Height, body mass, body mass index, fat-free mass, and fat mass were positively associated with RMR in both men and women athletes (r = 0.4-0.8; p < 0.001). Body mass (men ß = 0.784; women ß = 0.832)) was the strongest predictor of RMR. Men athletes have a higher absolute RMR compared to their women counterparts, which is influenced by greater body mass and fat-free mass. Body mass is the strongest predictor of RMR in both men and women athletes.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Funct Morphol Kinesiol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Funct Morphol Kinesiol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos