Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of funding disruptions on large-scale teen pregnancy prevention research projects.
Hofert, Gina Gonzalez; Martinez-Garcia, Genevieve; Tingey, Lauren; Ybarra, Michele; Philliber, Ash; Karas, Jordan; Grafals, Melanie; Garrido, Milagros; Parchem, Sarah; Yager-DeConcini, Erin.
Afiliación
  • Hofert GG; Cabarrus Health Alliance. 300 Mooresville Rd., Kannapolis, NC 28081, USA.
  • Martinez-Garcia G; Healthy Teen Network, PO Box 741, Churchville, MD 21028, USA.
  • Tingey L; Johns Hopkins Center for American Indian Health, 415 N. Washington St., Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
  • Ybarra M; Center for Innovative Public Health Research, 555 N. El Camino Real #A347, San Clemente, CA 92672-6745, USA.
  • Philliber A; Philliber Research & Evaluation, 6 Main Street, Accord, NY 12404, USA.
  • Karas J; Cabarrus Health Alliance. 300 Mooresville Rd., Kannapolis, NC 28081, USA.
  • Grafals M; Cabarrus Health Alliance. 300 Mooresville Rd., Kannapolis, NC 28081, USA.
  • Garrido M; Healthy Teen Network, PO Box 741, Churchville, MD 21028, USA.
  • Parchem S; Chicago Department of Public Health, 333 S. State St., Room 200, Chicago, IL 60604, USA.
  • Yager-DeConcini E; Child & Family Resources, Inc., 2800 E. Broadway Blvd, Tucson, AZ 85716, USA.
Health Policy Open ; 5: 100101, 2023 Dec 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37636593
ABSTRACT
To advance the field of teen pregnancy prevention, new interventions must be developed and tested. The federal Teen Pregnancy Prevention program (TPP) funds the evaluation of promising interventions. We report on a funding disruption to 21 TPP Tier 2B research grantees across the US that was unusual for its ideological causation, sudden timing, severity, and ultimately court decisions compelling the agency to reverse the decision. We address the following question How did challenges presented by the attempted funding termination impact grantees' ability to continue with their intended research? Results from grantee surveys in 2019 demonstrate the funding disruption negatively impacted participant recruitment, organizational collaboration, program delivery, research rigor, and compromised grantees' ability to complete high-quality evaluations. Results also show most projects could continue, with modified research goals, when funding was reinstated. We conclude administrations should avoid arbitrarily and prematurely terminating research projects. However, there is merit in reinstating funds to projects should a disruption occur. Results from this work are particularly relevant as we anticipate how health research projects may manage other disruptions to funding or timetables, such as those caused by COVID-19. Results are relevant to policy makers, researchers, government and private funders, grantees, and technical assistance teams.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Health Policy Open Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Health Policy Open Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos