Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adapting the Diabetes Prevention Program for Older Adults: Descriptive Study.
Beasley, Jeannette M; Johnston, Emily A; Costea, Denisa; Sevick, Mary Ann; Rogers, Erin S; Jay, Melanie; Zhong, Judy; Chodosh, Joshua.
Afiliación
  • Beasley JM; Department of Nutrition and Food Studies, New York University Steinhardt School of School of Culture, Education, and Human Development, New York, NY, United States.
  • Johnston EA; Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
  • Costea D; Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
  • Sevick MA; Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
  • Rogers ES; Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
  • Jay M; Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
  • Zhong J; Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
  • Chodosh J; Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
JMIR Form Res ; 7: e45004, 2023 Aug 29.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37642989
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Prediabetes affects 26.4 million people aged 65 years or older (48.8%) in the United States. Although older adults respond well to the evidence-based Diabetes Prevention Program, they are a heterogeneous group with differing physiological, biomedical, and psychosocial needs who can benefit from additional support to accommodate age-related changes in sensory and motor function.

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this paper is to describe adaptations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Diabetes Prevention Program aimed at preventing diabetes among older adults (ages ≥65 years) and findings from a pilot of 2 virtual sessions of the adapted program that evaluated the acceptability of the content.

METHODS:

The research team adapted the program by incorporating additional resources necessary for older adults. A certified lifestyle coach delivered 2 sessions of the adapted content via videoconference to 189 older adults.

RESULTS:

The first session had a 34.9% (38/109) response rate to the survey, and the second had a 34% (30/88) response rate. Over three-quarters (50/59, 85%) of respondents agreed that they liked the virtual program, with 82% (45/55) agreeing that they would recommend it to a family member or a friend.

CONCLUSIONS:

This data will be used to inform intervention delivery in a randomized controlled trial comparing in-person versus virtual delivery of the adapted program.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: JMIR Form Res Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: JMIR Form Res Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos