Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative analysis of sleeve conversions of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program 2020 Database.
Clapp, Benjamin; Cottam, Samuel; Salame, Marita; Marr, John D; Galvani, Carlos; Ponce, Jaime; English, Wayne J; Ghanem, Omar M.
Afiliación
  • Clapp B; Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, Texas.
  • Cottam S; Bariatric Medicine Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Salame M; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Marr JD; Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, Texas.
  • Galvani C; Department of Surgery, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.
  • Ponce J; Department of Surgery, CHI Memorial Medical Group, Chattanooga, Tennessee.
  • English WJ; Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
  • Ghanem OM; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: Ghanem.omar@mayo.edu.
Surg Obes Relat Dis ; 20(1): 47-52, 2024 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37666727
BACKGROUND: Although the sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the dominant bariatric procedure, studies have shown conversion rates of up to 30%. These conversions are generally for weight regain (WR), insufficient weight loss (IWL) or gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Before 2020, details on why conversions were being performed were not collected in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Participant Use Data File (PUF). Now, the indication for sleeve conversion is noted in the PUF, allowing identification and reporting sleeve conversion reasons. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine the reasons for SG conversions nationwide. SETTING: The 2020 MBSAQIP PUF. METHODS: The 2020 MBSAQIP PUF was examined to determine the reasons why SG were converted to other operations. The data field of "Revision/Conversion Final Indication" was used along with "Procedure type." Primary bariatric operations were excluded. Descriptive statistics were applied. Different reasons for conversion and operations were compared by preoperative characteristics and operative outcomes. RESULTS: There were 103,782 primary SG reported in the 2020 PUF. There were 7181 SG that were converted to other operations. The most common conversion (86.2%) was to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The main reason for SG conversion was GERD at 48.4%, followed by WR/IWL (41.9%). Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch and single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve patients differed significantly from RYGB patients in specific preoperative characteristics and operative outcomes. CONCLUSION: The most common procedure SG is converted to is the RYGB. GERD was the most common reason for SG conversion, followed by WR/IWL.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Obesidad Mórbida / Derivación Gástrica / Reflujo Gastroesofágico / Laparoscopía / Cirugía Bariátrica Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Implementation_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Obes Relat Dis Asunto de la revista: METABOLISMO Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Obesidad Mórbida / Derivación Gástrica / Reflujo Gastroesofágico / Laparoscopía / Cirugía Bariátrica Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Implementation_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Obes Relat Dis Asunto de la revista: METABOLISMO Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos