Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Han, Hao; Song, Yifan; Li, Yiming; Zhou, Hengcai; Fu, Yufei; Li, Jie.
Afiliación
  • Han H; Graduate School of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
  • Song Y; Department of Orthopaedics, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Affiliation Xuzhou Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiefang South Road No. 199, Xuzhou, 221009, Jiangsu, China.
  • Li Y; Graduate School of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
  • Zhou H; Department of Orthopaedics, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Affiliation Xuzhou Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiefang South Road No. 199, Xuzhou, 221009, Jiangsu, China.
  • Fu Y; Department of Orthopaedics, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Affiliation Xuzhou Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiefang South Road No. 199, Xuzhou, 221009, Jiangsu, China.
  • Li J; Department of Orthopaedics, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Affiliation Xuzhou Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiefang South Road No. 199, Xuzhou, 221009, Jiangsu, China.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 18(1): 656, 2023 Sep 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37667363
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-TLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases by meta-analysis.

METHODS:

A computer-based search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, and Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP) was conducted from the inception of the each database to April 2023. The searched literature was then screened according to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The critical data were extracted and analyzed using Review Manager software5.4.1. Pooled effects were calculated on the basis of data attributes by mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of the studies.

RESULTS:

A total of 13 studies and 949 patients met the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis, 445 in the UBE-LIF group and 504 in the MIS-TLIF group. UBE-TLIF was superior to MIS-TLIF in terms of intraoperative blood flow, postoperative drainage flow, duration of hospital stay, VAS score for low back pain and ODI score, but the operative time was longer than MIS-TLIF group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of total complication rate, modified Macnab grading criteria, fusion rate, VAS score of leg pain, lumbar lordosis, intervertebral disk height.

CONCLUSION:

Both UBE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF are effective surgical modalities for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases. They have similar treatment outcomes, but UBE-TLIF has the advantages of less intraoperative blood loss, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and faster recovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study has been registered at INPLASY.COM (No. INPLASY202320087).
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fusión Vertebral / Vértebras Lumbares Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Límite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Orthop Surg Res Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fusión Vertebral / Vértebras Lumbares Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Límite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Orthop Surg Res Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China
...