Histologic Osseointegration Level Comparing Titanium and Zirconia Dental Implants: Meta-analysis of Preclinical Studies.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
; 38(4): 667-680, 2023.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-37669522
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
To assess the literature comparing histologic levels of osseointegration for titanium vs zirconia dental implants. Materials andMethods:
This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021236781). Electronic and manual searches were carried out through the PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and Embase databases with a platform-specific search strategy combining controlled terms (MeSH and Emtree) and text words. The articles were selected by two independent investigators who evaluated the articles based on the criteria for eligibility.Results:
A total of 17 articles were included. All were preclinical studies. The populations included dogs (27.55%), minipigs (14.28%), rats (14.28%), and rabbits (43.89%); and the implantation site varied among the mandible (36.82%), maxilla (9.04%), tibia (17.64%), skull (10.70%), and femur (25.80%). A total of 370 titanium (Ti) implants and 537 zirconia (Zr) implants were evaluated. The average osseointegration (% bone-to-implant contact) for Zr was 55.51% (17.6% to 89.09%), and for Ti was 58.50% (23.2% to 87.85%). There was no statistical difference between studies at the 2-month follow-up (P = .672), but this difference was significant at 1 and 3 months (P < .001).Conclusions:
Within the limitations of this review, Zr implants had a similar level of osseointegration compared to Ti implants. Nonetheless, because these findings are based on preclinical research, all data must be carefully examined.
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Implantes Dentales
/
Oseointegración
Tipo de estudio:
Systematic_reviews
Límite:
Animals
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
Asunto de la revista:
ODONTOLOGIA
Año:
2023
Tipo del documento:
Article