Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Nature and extent of disruptions to staff clinical supervision practices in health care settings due to COVID-19: A survey study.
Martin, Priya; Argus, Geoff; Fox, Jordan; Gurney, Tiana; McGrail, Matthew; Kumar, Saravana; Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, Srinivas.
Afiliación
  • Martin P; Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
  • Argus G; Advanced Clinical Educator - Interprofessional, Darling Downs Health, Baillie Henderson Hospital, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
  • Fox J; Southern Queensland Rural Health, The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
  • Gurney T; School of Psychology and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
  • McGrail M; Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
  • Kumar S; Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
  • Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S; Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
Aust J Rural Health ; 31(5): 1008-1016, 2023 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37694931
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical supervision practices of health care workers in health care settings in one Australian state. METHOD: A bespoke survey was developed and administered online using Qualtrics™. The survey consisted of Likert scale and closed questions, with options for free text comments. Numerical data were analysed descriptively and using Chi-Square tests. Textual data were analysed through content analysis. RESULTS: Of the 178 survey respondents, 42% were from allied health disciplines, 39% from nursing and midwifery, and 19% from medicine. The type and mode (i.e., face-to-face, telesupervision) of clinical supervision prior to the pandemic and at the time of survey completion (i.e., July-August 2021) were similar. Eighteen percent of respondents had a change in supervision arrangements but only 5% had a change in supervisor. For the 37% who changed roles due to COVID-19, 81% felt their current supervisor was still able to support them, 69% were still having their supervisory needs met. Analyses of textual data resulted in the development of two categories: Supervision deteriorating, and some clinical supervision functions (i.e., formative and restorative) being more impacted than others (i.e., normative). CONCLUSION: There were substantial disruptions to several parameters of clinical supervision due to COVID-19, that may pose a threat to high quality supervision. Health care workers reported pandemic-induced stress and mental health challenges that were not always addressed by effective restorative supervision practices.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Aust J Rural Health Asunto de la revista: ENFERMAGEM / SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia Pais de publicación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Aust J Rural Health Asunto de la revista: ENFERMAGEM / SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia Pais de publicación: Australia