Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Consensus for voice quality assessment in clinical practice: guidelines of the European Laryngological Society and Union of the European Phoniatricians.
Lechien, Jerome R; Geneid, Ahmed; Bohlender, Jörg E; Cantarella, Giovanna; Avellaneda, Juan C; Desuter, Gauthier; Sjogren, Elisabeth V; Finck, Camille; Hans, Stephane; Hess, Markus; Oguz, Haldun; Remacle, Marc J; Schneider-Stickler, Berit; Tedla, Miroslav; Schindler, Antonio; Vilaseca, Isabel; Zabrodsky, Michal; Dikkers, Frederik G; Crevier-Buchman, Lise.
Afiliación
  • Lechien JR; Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, University of Paris Saclay, Paris, France. jerome.lechien@umons.ac.be.
  • Geneid A; Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, Brussels, Belgium. jerome.lechien@umons.ac.be.
  • Bohlender JE; Department of Laryngology and Broncho-Esophagology, EpiCURA Hospital, Anatomy Department of University of Mons, Mons, Belgium. jerome.lechien@umons.ac.be.
  • Cantarella G; Phonetics and Phonology Laboratory (UMR 7018 CNRS, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle/Paris 3), Paris, France. jerome.lechien@umons.ac.be.
  • Avellaneda JC; Department of Otolaryngology and Phoniatrics-Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Desuter G; Department of Phoniatrics and Speech Pathology, Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Sjogren EV; Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Fondazione, IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
  • Finck C; Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
  • Hans S; Department of Surgery, Otolaryngology Service. Hospital Universitario Mayor Mederi, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Hess M; ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
  • Oguz H; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Remacle MJ; Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Liege, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
  • Schneider-Stickler B; Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, University of Paris Saclay, Paris, France.
  • Tedla M; Phonetics and Phonology Laboratory (UMR 7018 CNRS, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle/Paris 3), Paris, France.
  • Schindler A; Medical Voice Center (MEVOC), Hamburg, Germany.
  • Vilaseca I; Department of Otolaryngology, Fonomer, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Zabrodsky M; Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, University of Paris Saclay, Paris, France.
  • Dikkers FG; Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Center Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Eich, Luxembourg.
  • Crevier-Buchman L; Department of Otorhinolaryngology Medical, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 280(12): 5459-5473, 2023 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37707614
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

To update the European guidelines for the assessment of voice quality (VQ) in clinical practice.

METHODS:

Nineteen laryngologists-phoniatricians of the European Laryngological Society (ELS) and the Union of the European Phoniatricians (UEP) participated to a modified Delphi process to propose statements about subjective and objective VQ assessments. Two anonymized voting rounds determined a consensus statement to be acceptable when 80% of experts agreed with a rating of at least 3/4. The statements with ≥ 3/4 score by 60-80% of experts were improved and resubmitted to voting until they were validated or rejected.

RESULTS:

Of the 90 initial statements, 51 were validated after two voting rounds. A multidimensional set of minimal VQ evaluations was proposed and included baseline VQ anamnesis (e.g., allergy, medical and surgical history, medication, addiction, singing practice, job, and posture), videolaryngostroboscopy (mucosal wave symmetry, amplitude, morphology, and movements), patient-reported VQ assessment (30- or 10-voice handicap index), perception (Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Strain), aerodynamics (maximum phonation time), acoustics (Mean F0, Jitter, Shimmer, and noise-to-harmonic ratio), and clinical instruments associated with voice comorbidities (reflux symptom score, reflux sign assessment, eating-assessment tool-10, and dysphagia handicap index). For perception, aerodynamics and acoustics, experts provided guidelines for the methods of measurement. Some additional VQ evaluations are proposed for voice professionals or patients with some laryngeal diseases.

CONCLUSION:

The ELS-UEP consensus for VQ assessment provides clinical statements for the baseline and pre- to post-treatment evaluations of VQ and to improve collaborative research by adopting common and validated VQ evaluation approach.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Otolaringología / Voz / Enfermedades de la Laringe Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Asunto de la revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Otolaringología / Voz / Enfermedades de la Laringe Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Asunto de la revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia