Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Donor bile duct evaluation with magnetic resonance cholangiography in living-donor liver transplantation: a novel anatomical classification for predicting surgical techniques.
Karakaya, Afak Durur; Gündogmus, Cemal Aydin; Kanmaz, Turan; Karatas, Cihan; Kapakin, Samet.
Afiliación
  • Karakaya AD; Koç University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Istanbul, Türkiye
  • Gündogmus CA; Koç University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Istanbul, Türkiye
  • Kanmaz T; Koç University Faculty of Medicine, Liver Transplantation Center, Istanbul, Türkiye
  • Karatas C; Koç University Faculty of Medicine, Liver Transplantation Center, Istanbul, Türkiye
  • Kapakin S; Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Erzurum, Türkiye
Diagn Interv Radiol ; 30(2): 74-79, 2024 03 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37724709
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To propose a novel, inclusive classification that facilitates the selection of the appropriate donor and surgical technique in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS:

The magnetic resonance cholangiography examinations of 201 healthy liver donors were retrospectively evaluated. The study group was classified according to the proposed classification. The findings were compared with the surgical technique used in 93 patients who underwent transplantation. The Couinaud, Huang, Karakas, Choi, and Ohkubo classifications were also applied to all cases.

RESULTS:

There were 118 right-lobe donors (58.7%) and 83 left-lateral-segment donors (41.3%). Fifty-six (28.8%) of the cases were classified as type 1, 136 (67.7%) as type 2, and 7 (3.5%) as type 3 in the proposed classification; all cases could be classified. The number of individuals able to become liver donors was 93. A total of 36 cases were type 1, 56 were type 2, and 1 was type 3. Of the type 1 donors, 83% required single anastomosis during transplantation, whereas six patients classified as type 1 required two anastomoses, all of which were caused by technical challenges during resection. Moreover, 51.8% of the cases classified as type 2 required additional anastomosis during transplantation. The type 3 patient required three anastomoses. The type 1 and type 2 donors required a different number of anastomoses (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

The proposed classification in this study includes all anatomical variations. This inclusive classification accurately predicts the surgical technique for LDLT.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trasplante de Hígado Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Diagn Interv Radiol Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / RADIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trasplante de Hígado Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Diagn Interv Radiol Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / RADIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article
...