Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prognosis of patients with T1 low-grade urothelial bladder cancer treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy.
Piszczek, Radoslaw; Krajewski, Wojciech; Subiela, Jose D; Del Giudice, Francesco; Nowak, Lukasz; Chorbinska, Joanna; Moschini, Marco; Masson-Lecomte, Alexandra; Bebane, Sonia; Cimadamore, Alessia; Grobet-Jeandin, Elisabeth; Rouprêt, Morgan; D'Andrea, David; Mastroianni, Riccardo; Gutierrez Hidalgo, Beatriz; Gomez Rivas, Juan; Mori, Keiichiro; Soria, Francesco; Laukhtina, Ekaterina; Mari, Andrea; Albisinni, Simone; Gallioli, Andrea; Mertens, Laura S; Pichler, Renate; Marcq, Gautier; Laszkiewicz, Jan; Halon, Agnieszka; Carrion, Diego M; Akand, Murat; Pradere, Benjamin; Shariat, Shahrokh F; Palou, Juan; Babjuk, Marko; Burgos Revilla, Javier; Malkiewicz, Bartosz; Szydelko, Tomasz.
Afiliación
  • Piszczek R; Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
  • Krajewski W; Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland - wk@softstar.pl.
  • Subiela JD; Department of Urology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, IRYCIS, University of Alcala, Madrid, Spain.
  • Del Giudice F; Department of Urology, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
  • Nowak L; Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
  • Chorbinska J; Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
  • Moschini M; Division of Experimental Oncology, Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
  • Masson-Lecomte A; Department of Urology, Saint-Louis Hospital, APHP, Paris Cité University, Paris, France.
  • Bebane S; Department of Urology, Saint-Louis Hospital, APHP, Paris Cité University, Paris, France.
  • Cimadamore A; Section of Pathological Anatomy, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy.
  • Grobet-Jeandin E; Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
  • Rouprêt M; Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
  • D'Andrea D; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Mastroianni R; Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
  • Gutierrez Hidalgo B; Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
  • Gomez Rivas J; Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
  • Mori K; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Soria F; Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin School of Medicine, Turin, Italy.
  • Laukhtina E; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Mari A; Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
  • Albisinni S; Department of Urology, Erasme Hospital, University Clinics of Brussels, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Gallioli A; Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Mertens LS; Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Pichler R; Department of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Marcq G; Department of Urology, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
  • Laszkiewicz J; Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
  • Halon A; Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
  • Carrion DM; Department of Urology, Torrejon University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • Akand M; Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Pradere B; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Shariat SF; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Palou J; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
  • Babjuk M; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Burgos Revilla J; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.
  • Malkiewicz B; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Szydelko T; Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Minerva Urol Nephrol ; 75(5): 591-599, 2023 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37728495
BACKGROUND: The existence and prognosis of T1LG (T1 low-grade) bladder cancer is controversial. Also, because of data paucity, it remains unclear what is the clinical history of bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) treated T1LG tumors and if it differs from other NMIBC (non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer) representatives. The aim of this study was to analyse recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with T1LG bladder cancers treated with BCG immunotherapy. METHODS: A multi-institutional and retrospective study of 2510 patients with Ta/T1 NMIBC with or without carcinoma in situ (CIS) treated with BCG (205 T1LG patients) was performed. Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank test for RFS and PFS to compare the survival between TaLG, TaHG, T1LG, and T1HG NMIBC were used. Also, T1LG tumors were categorized into EAU2021 risk groups and PFS analysis was performed, and Cox multivariate model for both RFS and PFS were constructed. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 52 months. For the T1LG cohort, the estimated RFS and PFS rates at 5-year were 59.3% and 89.2%, respectively. While there were no differences in RFS between NMIBC subpopulations, a slightly better PFS was found in T1LG NMIBC compared to T1HG (5-year PFS; T1LG vs. T1HG: 82% vs. 89%; P<0.001). A heterogeneous classification of patients with T1LG NMIBC was observed when EAU 2021 prognostic model was applied, finding a statistically significant worse PFS in patients classified as high-risk T1LG (5-year PFS; 81.8%) compared to those in intermediate (5-year PFS; 93,4%), and low-risk T1LG tumors (5-year PFS; 98,1%). CONCLUSIONS: The RFS of T1LG was comparable to other NMIBC subpopulations. The PFS of T1LG tumors was significantly better than of T1HG NMIBC. The EAU2021 scoring model heterogeneously categorized the risk of progression in T1LG tumors and the high-risk T1LG had the worst PFS.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria / Carcinoma de Células Transicionales / Mycobacterium bovis Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Minerva Urol Nephrol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Polonia Pais de publicación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria / Carcinoma de Células Transicionales / Mycobacterium bovis Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Minerva Urol Nephrol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Polonia Pais de publicación: Italia