Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Virtual 3D femur model to assess femoral version: comparison to the 2D axial slice approach.
Iwasaka-Neder, Jade; Bixby, Sarah D; Bedoya, M Alejandra; Liu, Enju; Jarrett, Delma Y; Agahigian, Donna; Tsai, Andy.
Afiliación
  • Iwasaka-Neder J; Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. jade.iwasaka-neder@childrens.harvard.edu.
  • Bixby SD; Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
  • Bedoya MA; Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
  • Liu E; Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
  • Jarrett DY; Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
  • Agahigian D; Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
  • Tsai A; Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Pediatr Radiol ; 53(12): 2411-2423, 2023 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37740782
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Quantifying femoral version is crucial in diagnosing femoral version abnormalities and for accurate pre-surgical planning. There are numerous methods for measuring femoral version, however, reliability studies for most of these methods excluded children with hip deformities.

OBJECTIVE:

To propose a method of measuring femoral version based on a virtual 3D femur model, and systematically compare its reliability to the widely used Murphy's 2D axial slice technique. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We searched our imaging database to identify hip/femur CTs performed on children (<18 years old) with a clinical indication of femoral version measurement (September 2021-August 2022). Exclusion criteria were prior hip surgery, and inadequate image quality or field-of-view. Two blinded radiologists independently measured femoral version using the virtual 3D femur model and Murphy's 2D axial slice method. To assess intrareader variability, we randomly selected 20% of the study sample for re-measurements by the two radiologists >2 weeks later. We analyzed the reliability and correlation of these techniques via intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis, and deformity subgroup analysis.

RESULTS:

Our study sample consisted of 142 femurs from 71 patients (10.6±4.4 years, male=31). Intra- and inter-reader correlations for both techniques were excellent (ICC≥0.91). However, Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the standard deviation (SD) of the absolute difference between the two radiologists for the Murphy method (mean 13.7°) was larger than that of the 3D femur model technique (mean 4.8°), indicating higher reader variability. In femurs with hip flexion deformity, the SD of the absolute difference for the Murphy technique was 17°, compared to 6.5° for the 3D femur model technique. In femurs with apparent coxa valga deformity, the SD of the absolute difference for the Murphy technique was 10.4°, compared to 5.2° for the 3D femur model technique.

CONCLUSION:

The 3D femur model technique is more reliable than the Murphy's 2D axial slice technique in measuring femoral version, especially in children with hip flexion and apparent coxa valga deformities.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Coxa Valga Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Child / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Radiol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Coxa Valga Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Child / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Radiol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos